ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. They asserted five causes of action: a claim under NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act; breaches of the 1851 Fort Laramie Treaty, the 1855 Lame Bull Treaty, the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty; and a failure to adhere to the Department of the Interior’s tribal consultation policies. 19-2128 (4th Cir.

Court 59

Court Government Litigating Litigation 59

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

Solicitor General Paul Clement, as well as lawyers from the New Jersey public-interest firm Cause of Action. There is no evidence that the absence of Chevron deference has caused any problems for the states, the Goldwater Institute writes. In the Supreme Court, the fisheries are represented by former U.S.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JANUARY 13, 2021

The records included spreadsheets tracking and analyzing comments, draft ANPRM fact sheets, meeting agendas, and emails and meeting invitations regarding CEQ’s process for managing comments. Federal Court Ordered FOIA Production of CEQ Records Related to NEPA Rulemaking. Southern Environmental Law Center v. 3:18-cv-00113 (W.D.

Court 52

Court Government Technology Assisted Review Litigating 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

Virginia Federal Court Said Challenge to NEPA Regulations Was Not Justiciable. Wild Virginia v. The District of Utah held that the lease suspensions merely maintained the status quo and therefore were not major federal actions subject to NEPA; the conservation groups therefore lacked standing. WildEarth Guardians v.

Court 49

Court Litigating Statute Litigation 49