Remove Cause of Action Remove Illinois Remove Laws
article thumbnail

United States: Seventh Circuit Tosses BIPA Class Action On Federal Labor Law Preemption Grounds - Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Mondaq

20, 2021), that a cause of action filed under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act by employees of Kerry, Inc., On September 20, 2021, the Seventh Circuit ruled in Fernandez v. Kerry, Inc., 21-1067 (7th Cir.

article thumbnail

Nine new relists as the court approaches the finish line

SCOTUSBlog

In the wake of the heavy use of reservists during the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and related military actions, Congress enacted a “differential pay bill” which sought to ensure that reservists whose military pay was less than their civilian pay continued earning at the higher civilian level during deployment. Court of Appeals for the D.C.

Court 118
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Case of the Day: Scalin v. Société Nationale SNCF

LettersBlogatory

They argued that they had a right of action under 28 U.S.C. 1605(a)(3), which creates an exception to foreign sovereign immunity when the case concerns “rights in property taken in violation of international law.” Their claim did not arise under the ATS or under state law, but under the FSIA itself.

article thumbnail

NO FAKES Act: Unpacking the New Bipartisan Bill on Digital Replicas

Patently O

The recording industry (RIAA) and the actors’ union (SAGAFTRA) have been the leading proponents of such a law. What about state laws? Existing state laws on digital replicas are not preempted, including the new laws that will come online January 1 in California, New York, and Illinois.

article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2021 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

The plaintiff also brought criminal charges against the defendant’s son arising from this incident and the defendant’s son pleaded guilty to assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [2]). In the United States, the original tortfeasor is liable for such injuries caused by negligent rescues.

Tort 47
article thumbnail

Spooky Torts: The 2022 List of Litigation Horrors

JonathanTurley

The plaintiff also brought criminal charges against the defendant’s son arising from this incident and the defendant’s son pleaded guilty to assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [2]). In the United States, the original tortfeasor is liable for such injuries caused by negligent rescues.

Tort 45
article thumbnail

Mopping up final business with 14 new relists

SCOTUSBlog

Doe , 20-1374 , concerns whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which incorporates its enforcement mechanisms) provides a disparate-impact cause of action for plaintiffs alleging disability discrimination, and whether such claims can be based on facially neutral health-plan terms.