Remove Cause of Action Remove Immigration Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Justices limit major SEC tool to penalize fraud

SCOTUSBlog

After all, like most administrative claims, it rests on a federal statute, not the common law, and it requires the agency to establish facts that do not match any cause of action known to the common law in 1791 (when the states ratified the Seventh Amendment).

article thumbnail

Government power, from federal agencies to counties, highlights January session

SCOTUSBlog

8 for a packed session of oral arguments – starting with immigration policy and the post-9/11 “No Fly List” and ending on Jan. The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. Share The justices returned to the bench on Jan. Garland and Garland v. .

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Municipalities of Puerto Rico v. Exxon: a unique class action against fossil fuel companies presses for climate accountability in the United States

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

In addition to more intense storms, the municipalities allege other physical climate change impacts, including coral reef degradation and massive algal blooms, as well as social, educational, and economic losses, including increased immigration from the municipalities and damages to the agricultural industry. Cases brought by cities.

article thumbnail

Vaccine requirements, cancer claims, and circuit splits

SCOTUSBlog

Monsanto had argued that FIFRA labeling provisions preempted state tort causes of action for failure to warn. The provision establishes procedures to be followed in determining what services a child requires, and creates a right to bring a civil action in court to enforce its provisions.

article thumbnail

Preemption, Bivens, conflicts of interest, and free exercise

SCOTUSBlog

On Friday afternoon, the Supreme Court granted review in five relisted cases , four of them involving the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases, the fifth involving the ability of states to intervene to defend the Trump administration’s “public charge” immigration rule. relisted after the Oct.