This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The NewYork Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that a lawsuit from Tax Equity Now NewYork (TENNY), which alleges disparities in the NewYork City property tax system are disproportionately burdening low-income and majority-people-of-color neighborhoods, can go forward in the NewYork state courts.
Albany, NewYork-based Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP has moved to trim breach of contract and disgorgement of fees claims brought by a former client over allegedly bungled tax advice, telling a NewYork federal judge the claims are redundant when the ex-client is also pursuing a legal malpractice cause of action.
On the heels of the high fashion retailer and the magazine publisher pushing back against the models’ claims in respective motions to dismiss, and a NewYork federal court stripping down the case, Condé Nast is trying to get the rest of the case – including the plaintiffs’ right of publicity and unjust enrichment claims – tossed out. .
Keenan of the Southern District of NewYork will hear oral argument on the motions to dismiss filed in City of NewYork v. a case in which NewYork City alleges these same companies’ same activities constitute a public nuisance and trespass under NewYork State law. BP P.L.C. ,
All of these federal lawsuits include claims that the agencies approving the projects violated the National Environmental Policy Act, among other federal causes of action. And in NewYork, the Town of Long Lake passed a 1-year moratorium in August 2023 on permits for battery energy storage systems.
The role of attribution is also receiving increasing focus as attorneys begin to rely more heavily on AI outputs for their legal documents. This form of copying and imitation is a longstanding legal tradition, but the question is whether copying ever goes too far. I hope that they did not overbill the client.
The family that formerly owned Brooks Brothers is in the midst of a $100 million legal battle after allegedly failing to “fulfill their contractual and fiduciary obligations to a Brooks Brothers minority shareholder and investor. TAL and co. are seeking damages to the tune of $100 million. . The case is Castle Apparel Limited, et al.
As relevant here, Section 11 includes a private cause of action in federal court if the statement includes any information that is materially false or misleading, at the behest of “any person acquiring such security.” A direct listing, approved by the NewYork Stock Exchange in the last decade, works differently.
Online IP infringement further convolutes matters due to the internet’s omnipresence and accessibility, making the establishment of jurisdiction a complicated process for legal professionals. were a corporation based in NewYork and owned the domain name www.hindustan.com. Brainlink International Inc., [1]
Here is a look at a dozen of the many interesting and notable fashion lawsuits and legal developments that we saw in 2021 …. It follows from the similarly-noteworthy July 2021 securities class action lawsuit that an individual named Jeeun Friel filed against Dapper Labs Inc., Nike Sued MSCHF Over Modified “Satan Shoes”.
On Tuesday, NewYork State Supreme Court Justice Thomas J. McNamara in Albany County dismissed a lawsuit filed in June 2011 by three members of Americans For Prosperity, a conservative advocacy group, that challenged NewYork’s participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) cap and trade program.
and Costco have settled their long-running lawsuit over the warehouse chain’s sale of “Tiffany” rings that were not made or authorized by the famed NewYork jewelry company. for willful trademark infringement and counterfeiting – and remanded the case back to the district court for a new trial. Tiffany & Co.
In total, at least 25 cases have been filed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, NewYork, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. The plaintiffs strategically pled state law claims and refrained from adding federal causes of action to their cases.
The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to allege an injury in fact since he “never explained why he had any legal right to have the document distributed.” EPA’s rescission of the methane standards for new sources has been challenged in the D.C. NewYork v.
One of the three men convicted in the assassination of Malcolm X is seeking USD 40 million in compensatory damages from the City of NewYork after he was proven innocent of involvement in the killing last year. The post Man exonerated in assassination of Malcolm X seeks $40M from NYC appeared first on JURIST - News.
Its previous right-of-publicity laws were an extension of its statutory right of privacy which provided that “any person whose name [or likeness] is used within [NewYork] for advertising [or trade] purposes without. written consent” can sue for an injunction and damages. The postmortem right attached to a “performer” does not expire.
2019, a bankruptcy court in NewYork put lawsuits against the company and the Sacklers on hold. 2021, a federal district court in NewYork vacated the bankruptcy court’s decision confirming the plan. The second question before the court centers on the legality of the plan itself. And in Sept.
It eventually travelled to NewYork and then to Saint Louis, Missouri, where it remained until 1976. Unbeknownst to the Cassirer family or the German government, the Pissarro was not lost. In 1951, it was acquired by a California gallery owner, who sold it to a Los Angeles collector. 1605(a)(3) ). The defendants moved to dismiss.
United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued a ruling in NewYork to apply Virginia’s choice of law standard that in turn applied California’s defamation laws. He is facing criminal charges in NewYork. It was a cascading deconstruction of the lawsuit. Jones , 370 F. 3d 630, 664 (W.D.
Accordingly, the state maintains, Shockleys case doesnt implicate a divide among the circuits on a legal question, merely a difference in internal procedures ancitipated by Congress. It argues that this includes whether to deny them over the dissents of some judges. Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co.
It gives information on newly adopted legal instruments and summarizes current projects that are presently making their way through the EU legislative process. It also refers to the laws enacted at the national level in Germany as a result of new European instruments.
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that as a former employee, Stanley lacked a cause of action under the ADA. 23-900 Issue: Whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates.
In a testament to her love of a lavish lifestyle, Reggiani – who was swiftly dubbed “ Vedova Nera” or “the Black Widow” by newspapers in Milan following her highly-publicized arrest – “was famous for having once said, ‘I would rather weep in a Rolls-Royce than be happy on a bicycle,’” the NewYork Times reported in late 1998.
However, there are still some notable additions that raise more legal frights. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. Sherri Perper, 56, of Queens, NewYork has filed a personal injury lawsuit due to defective shoes allegedly acquired from Forum Novelties.
She insists in the video that she knows all of the governing legal rules and shows the path in detail. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. The retailer filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to warn.
The stakes in the case are high: The challengers argue that the current deferential standard is unconstitutional, while the Biden administration contends that overturning the existing doctrine would be a “convulsive shock to the legal system.” The doctrine at the center of the case is known as the Chevron doctrine.
A NewYork judge found on Tuesday that former President Donald Trump and his business associates committed fraud by lying about the financial valuation of various business assets from as early as 2011. ” As a result, the court found that Trump and his two sons, Donald Trump Jr.
Former US President Donald Trump filed a motion for a mistrial Wednesday in the NewYork civil fraud trial against the Trumps and the Trump Organization. ” A court has discretion to declare a mistrial when there is evidence of an unfair trial, which in turn results in a new trial.
The court found that, as pled, the complaint was “premised solely on state law” and that City of NewYork v. and the Second Circuit’s decision in City of NewYork v. On the merits, the court found that the Section 401 certification was not affected by legal error and was supported by substantial evidence in the record.
As for whether the Gucci family members have legal grounds to proceed on in the U.S., Paramount prevailed in the case, with a NewYork federal court dismissing the $25 million-plus lawsuit on summary judgment. What Rights Does the Family Have? In her December 2018 order, Judge Joanna Seybert of the U.S.
If the justices take up the border-wall case, it will be the second case added to the court’s docket this term involving the legality of border-wall construction. In NewYork v. Department of Justice and City of NewYork v. NewYork City, NewYork state and several other states seek review of that decision.
It references NewYorks and Vermonts Climate Superfund Laws, which require fossil fuel companies to pay damages for their share of greenhouse gas emissions over specified time periods. New sources of preemption or other federal laws disallowing certain state or local action would have to come from Congress.
” She even posted a walk-through video and insisted that she knows all of the governing legal rules. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. The retailer filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to warn.
In 2020, the cancelation of parades and the reduction of travel has led to a very different legal profile of holiday mishaps and malfeasance. A recent survey of NewYork doctors found that 60 percent saw an increase in ER visits for cooking wounds and turkey carving accidents. Podder was found legally at fault.
He lost efforts to prevent a $10,000 per day fine for contempt in failing to turn over evidence on his assets in the civil investigation by NewYork Attorney General Letitia James. While Southern District of NewYork Judge John Koeltl does not mention sanctions, he does categorically dismiss the actions on various grounds.
On Monday opening statements began in the civil bench trial of the State of NewYork vs. Donald Trump, et al over-inflated assets in fraudulent statements. Regardless of the legal outcome of this bench trial, this fantasy has been exposed as the made-up story and financial fraud it has always been.
The federal district court for the Western District of NewYork denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit challenging a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) final rule establishing an optional new inspection system for hog slaughter establishments. City of NewYork v. Bernhardt , Nos. 21-4019, 21-4020 (10th Cir.
One California-based firm, Gibson Dunn, did offer O’Connor a job – as a legal secretary. For the next five years, O’Connor juggled caring for her children with a hodgepodge of legal jobs, ranging from grading bar exams to bankruptcy appointments. O’Connor’s opinion in Jackson v. In a letter to President George W.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content