ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MAY 12, 2023

In total, at least 25 cases have been filed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. The plaintiffs strategically pled state law claims and refrained from adding federal causes of action to their cases.

Court 64

Court Court Decisions Government Laws 64

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 2, 2025

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over whether Planned Parenthood has a legal right under federal civil rights laws to challenge the order by South Carolinas governor barring abortion clinics, including Planned Parenthood, from participating in Medicaid.

Court 65

Court Statute Cause of Action Laws 65

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 2, 2024

After obtaining new legal representation, Gamboa filed a motion to reopen the judgment on the ground that Ritenour had “abandoned” him. Hicks 23-324 Issues : (1) Whether a cause of action exists under Bivens v. South Carolina State Ports Authority v. The district court denied that motion as well, and the U.S.

Attorney 102

Attorney Cause of Action Court Government 102

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 31, 2021

However, there are still some notable additions that raise more legal frights. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. We also have a potential duel case out of Aiken, South Carolina from one year ago. Charges pending.

Tort 44

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 44

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2022

She insists in the video that she knows all of the governing legal rules and shows the path in detail. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. We also have a potential duel case out of Aiken, South Carolina from one year ago. Charges pending.

Tort 43

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 43

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2023

” She even posted a walk-through video and insisted that she knows all of the governing legal rules. McKamey insists that it is just a “crazy haunted house” and stops well short of the legal-definition of torture. Outcome: Janik is charged with assault and reckless endangerment for his actions. Charges pending.

Tort 55

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 55