SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 28, 2023

is whether and to what extent the federal trademark statute, known as the Lanham Act, applies to infringing conduct that takes place outside the United States. Last week’s argument mainly revolved around how to apply this modern test to the trademark statute, enacted in 1946, and what precedential weight, if any, to attach to Steele.

Statute 108

Statute Cause of Action Court Government 108

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2022

Cassirer’s heirs make three main arguments. Second, Congress enacted the FSIA in light of the background principle of federalism that state law, including state choice-of-law doctrines, should apply to state causes of action, and nothing in the statute indicates any intent to deviate from that principle.

Tort 118

Tort Court Laws Litigation 118

Diane Drain

JULY 16, 2021

Arizona Residential Eviction Actions Procedures – effective July 15, 2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED beginning on the effective date of this Order, all other eviction cases shall be processed solely under Arizona statutes and rules, except as provided herein. PLEADINGS.

Calendaring 104

Calendaring Statute Court Cause of Action 104

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 30, 2022

Kavanaugh said it would be “bizarre” to allow suits against states under the Family and Medical Leave Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, among others, but not under statutes enacted pursuant to Congress’ war powers, “where the national interest is at its apex as compared to those other areas.” It is likely that, as in Alden v.

Statute 100

Statute Cause of Action Court Government 100

LettersBlogatory

AUGUST 23, 2021

Phillip decision , I am in the unhappy position of having to side with the Nazi collaborators on the main legal issue in the case. It creates an exception to foreign sovereign immunity but does not itself create a cause of action. 1605A, does not just create an exception to immunity but also creates a federal cause of action).

Cause of Action 52

Cause of Action Statute Tort Court 52

Conflict of Laws

APRIL 25, 2024

The wide-reaching effect of a previous Court of Appeal decision on the interpretation of gateway (n) which covers a claim brought under statutes dealing with serious crimes such as corruption and dug trafficking and ‘any other written law’ is also yet to be grasped by litigants. [5]

Cause of Action 69

Cause of Action Court Laws Contract 69

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 20, 2024

As relevant here, they argued that the board should have done more to study the effects of extracting and producing the main cargo that the rail line would carry — crude oil – even though the Surface Transportation Board doesn’t regulate oil production. Opponents of the project challenged that approval in the D.C. In Stanley v.

Court 118

Court Laws Government Real Estate 118

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 31, 2021

Such candies include the main active ingredient linked to the psychedelic effects of cannabis – the plant from which marijuana is derived. Even an accidental distribution of such infused candies would constitute child endangerment and be subject to both negligence and strict liability actions in torts. 32; 285 S.W. 455 (1926). “A

Tort 47

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 47

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2022

Such candies include the main active ingredient linked to the psychedelic effects of cannabis – the plant from which marijuana is derived. Even an accidental distribution of such infused candies would constitute child endangerment and be subject to both negligence and strict liability actions in torts. 32; 285 S.W. 455 (1926).

Tort 45

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 45

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2023

Such candies include the main active ingredient linked to the psychedelic effects of cannabis – the plant from which marijuana is derived. Even an accidental distribution of such infused candies would constitute child endangerment and be subject to both negligence and strict liability actions in torts. Trimble ␣ 315 Mo. 32; 285 S.W.

Tort 57

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 57

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 16, 2020

The First Circuit—like the Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits in other climate change cases—concluded that the scope of its appellate review was limited to whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Maine High Court Said State Law Would Not Preempt Local Ordinance Prohibiting Crude Oil Loading.

Cause of Action 96

Cause of Action Court Government Litigation 96

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JANUARY 13, 2021

Maine Federal Court Declined to Enjoin Work on Electric Transmission Project. 1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The Court further found that because plaintiffs did not reference specific sections of laws that cause specific breaches of Charter rights, their claims presented no reasonable cause of action.

Court 52

Court Government Technology Assisted Review Litigation 52