Cause of Action Manufacturing Statute 
The IP Law Blog
MARCH 9, 2023
Plaintiff had argued that using the patented methods in the design process, which guides the subsequent manufacturing process, is sufficient to state a claim. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure rule 12(b)(6), a party may bring a motion to dismiss a cause of action that fails to state a claim.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 9, 2023
VIP Products firmly rejected the use of the Jack Daniel’s trademarks by a manufacturer selling a line of dog toys that mock various beverage manufacturers. That statute has an exception that protects competing uses if their use of the mark is “noncommercial.” Share Thursday’s decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Conflict of Laws
DECEMBER 19, 2023
The Court held that local consumer legislation – in the form of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) – applies to foreign manufacturers. The decision is of particular interest to New Zealand consumers and manufacturers of goods that are supplied in New Zealand, as well as traders advertising their products to New Zealanders.
Patently O
MARCH 18, 2024
Tube-Mac, is the plaintiff in this case and is looking to manufacture its own version of the container systems. 256. . = = = One interesting aspect of this decision relates to absence of a statute of limitations. ”) Patent law does not have a specific statute of limitations associated with claims to correct inventorship.
Patently O
MARCH 25, 2021
2017) refocused attention on a required nexus between the the defendant’s contacts with the forum state and the cause of action. The decision suggested to many that defendant’s connections should have a causal-link with the cause of action. ” Quoting Reiter (1979). The “or” has meaning.
The Fashion Law
JULY 30, 2021
Primarily, WGACA argues that Chanel has no evidence that the 12 allegedly counterfeit bags that it sold – which Chanel says have “serial numbers purportedly stolen from a Chanel factory” – were not manufactured by a Chanel factory. in 2012.”
At the Lectern
JULY 28, 2022
The opinion acknowledged, “under our interpretation of the relevant statutes a provider has greater remedies against a private health care service plan than it does against a public entity health care service plan.” ” Horvitz & Levy filed the successful petition for review.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content