Mondaq

DECEMBER 28, 2021

On December 17, 2021, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (SJC) held that an employee has a cause of action against an employer for wrongful discharge where the employer terminates the employee for.

Cause of Action 40

Cause of Action Statute Court 40

At the Lectern

JULY 28, 2022

The opinion acknowledged, “under our interpretation of the relevant statutes a provider has greater remedies against a private health care service plan than it does against a public entity health care service plan.” ” Horvitz & Levy filed the successful petition for review.

Government 49

Government Court Contract Cause of Action 49

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 31, 2021

See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. The actions of third parties often cut off liability as a matter of proximate causation, though courts have held that you can be liable for creating circumstances where crimes or intentional torts are foreseeable. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue. Taunton High School. __. 32; 285 S.W.

Tort 50

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 50

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2022

See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue. The Massachusetts case of Smith v. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. The retailer filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ cause of action for failure to warn.

Tort 48

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 48

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2023

See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue. While a lawsuit is unlikely, it would certainly be an interesting — and not unwarranted — claim. __ Tauton High School District The Massachusetts case of Smith v. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations.

Tort 59

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 59

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. Haaland , No. 1:21-cv-02317 (D.D.C.,

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Court Laws 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 16, 2020

The First Circuit—like the Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits in other climate change cases—concluded that the scope of its appellate review was limited to whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. The plaintiffs plan to appeal.

Cause of Action 96

Cause of Action Court Government Litigation 96