Patently O
JANUARY 4, 2024
Although plagiarism is not a cause of action, copyright infringement is – and that serves as the basis of the lawsuit here. In this case, HLG alleges that Winston & Strawn plagiarized a motion to dismiss that HLG had filed on behalf of a client in an earlier consolidated patent case. 2013 WL 4666330, at *1 (D.
Patently O
MARCH 25, 2021
2017) refocused attention on a required nexus between the the defendant’s contacts with the forum state and the cause of action. The decision suggested to many that defendant’s connections should have a causal-link with the cause of action.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently O
MAY 17, 2021
In particular, the Federal Circuit found (1) sufficient minimum contacts with the state of California related to the cause of action and (2) that exercise of jurisdiction by a California court would be reasonable. = = =. 9] On appeal, however, the Federal Circuit reversed—finding no problem with the case proceeding in California.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MAY 12, 2023
In total, at least 25 cases have been filed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. The plaintiffs strategically pled state law claims and refrained from adding federal causes of action to their cases.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
In Minnesota v. the defendants filed their opposition to Minnesota’s remand motion (November 9). Petition Filed Challenging Water Quality Certification for Minnesota Crude Oil Pipeline. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (In re 401 Certification for Line 3 Replacement Project) , No. Chevron Corp. 20-cv-1636 (D.
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 18, 2022
He taught and held clinical positions in psychiatry at the University of Minnesota Medical School and the Medical College of Georgia. Josephson is advancing five claims: FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of Plaintiff’s First Amendment Right to Freedom of Speech Retaliation (42 U.S.C.
SCOTUSBlog
JULY 1, 2021
Doe , 20-1374 , concerns whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which incorporates its enforcement mechanisms) provides a disparate-impact cause of action for plaintiffs alleging disability discrimination, and whether such claims can be based on facially neutral health-plan terms.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
124 
Let's personalize your content