SCOTUSBlog

JULY 2, 2024

Share The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a North Dakota truck stop can bring a challenge to a regulation issued 13 years ago by the Federal Reserve Board. Barrett explained that the statute of limitations “begins to run only when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action.”

Court 137

Court Statute Cause of Action Administrative Law 137

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 27, 2021

It acknowledges a “shallow conflict” on whether federal law impliedly preempts such causes of action, but recommends the court not take the case. North Dakota v. The solicitor general’s office has now filed its brief. relisted after the Sept. 15 conferences). Environmental Protection Agency , 20-1780.

Court 90

Court Government Cause of Action Manufacturing 90

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The District of Utah held that the lease suspensions merely maintained the status quo and therefore were not major federal actions subject to NEPA; the conservation groups therefore lacked standing. North Dakota and Second Coal Company Asked for Review of D.C. June 23, 2021); North Dakota v. Living Rivers v.

Court 49

Court Litigation Litigating Statute 49