SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 8, 2024

The statute includes a list of information the government must include – most notably, the time and place of the removal hearing. A noncitizen who does not attend a removal proceeding can be ordered removed as long as written notice has been provided to him under the statute. Tori Madden) The question before the justices on Jan.

Government 84

Government Statute Court Cause of Action 84

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. Environmental Groups Challenged Authorization for New Natural Gas Plant in Oregon. Oregon Department of Energy , No. City of Los Angeles , No.

Court 59

Court Government Litigation Litigating 59

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 27, 2020

In Portland, Oregon, Chester Hester, 24, Nicole Noriega, 38, and Bailey Willack, 23, allegedly spent Thanksgiving morning vandalizing business by smashing windows and spray-painting graffiti on banks and other businesses. The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations.

Tort 42

Tort Statute Criminal Law Court 42

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 16, 2020

Portland, Oregon. Source: Gary Halvorson, Oregon State Archives. Oregon Supreme Court Said Public Trust Doctrine Did Not Impose Obligation to Protect Resources from Climate Change. Maui asserted causes of action for public nuisance, private nuisance, strict liability failure to warn, negligent failure to warn, and trespass.

Cause of Action 96

Cause of Action Court Government Litigation 96

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 4, 2025

The second lawsuit was filed more than two years later by California, Oregon, and Minnesota. Trump asserted the following causes of action: Violation of the separation of powers doctrine. Ultra vires action. In both cases, the U.S. Violation of the Take Care Clause. This case was also assigned to Judge Moss.

Statute 59

Statute Litigation Litigating Court 59

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” Living Rivers v. Hoffman , No. 4:19-cv-00057 (D. Utah June 21, 2021). In re Enbridge Energy, LP , Nos.

Court 49

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 49