ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. 19-2128 (4th Cir. Ninth Circuit Rejected Claim That CEQA Applied to Taxi Rules for Airport Pickups.

Court 59

Court Government Litigation Litigating 59

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2024

Medical Marijuana notes that the Supreme Court indicated – a bit offhandedly, in an opinion addressing another issue – that RICO’s private cause of action “exclud[ed], for example, personal injuries.” If granted, it should make for an interesting argument. We’ll know more soon. Until next time! New Relists Medical Marijuana, Inc.

Felony 125

Felony Personal Injury Court Cause of Action 125

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 20, 2024

Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that as a former employee, Stanley lacked a cause of action under the ADA. She claims that the retirement benefits for disabled retirees explicitly treats them worse than others. In Stanley v. Florida and Moore v. rescheduled before the Mar. Kentucky ex rel.

Court 127

Court Laws Government Real Estate 127

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 20, 2021

United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued a ruling in New York to apply Virginia’s choice of law standard that in turn applied California’s defamation laws. Nunes did not ask for such a correction under California law because he filed in Virginia. It was a cascading deconstruction of the lawsuit. Jones , 370 F.

Tort 35

Tort Cause of Action Laws Court 35

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2023

See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. That much was clear given his response to finding fake spiders scattered around the West Virginia office for Halloween. OUTCOME: Reversed dismissal on the basis of tolling of statute of limitations. White clearly does not like spiders, even fake ones. Trimble ␣ 315 Mo.

Tort 58

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 58

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 27, 2020

Oh yea, he was reportedly not wearing a mask outside of Trump’s Virginia gold course but he was wearing an inflatable Trump inner tube. The litigation over last year’s lettuce recall has only just started due to the statute of limitations. Accordingly, Miller was in violation of a statute in addition to being negligent. __.

Tort 37

Tort Statute Criminal Law Court 37

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2024

Justice John Paul Stevens set out a two-part test for courts to review an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. If it has not, the court must uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it is reasonable. In the Supreme Court, the fisheries are represented by former U.S.

Stare Decisis 145

Stare Decisis Court Statute Government 145

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. West Virginia v.

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Court Laws 40

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 3, 2021

The district court dismissed the claims against Egbert, noting that causes of action under Bivens v. But a panel of the 9th Circuit reversed, holding that Bivens actions are available for such claims against Border Patrol officers. City of Fredericksburg, Virginia , 21-164. The statute does not define the term “minister.”

Cause of Action 100

Cause of Action Court Government Manufacturing 100

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JANUARY 13, 2021

1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute.

Court 52

Court Government Technology Assisted Review Litigation 52

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 2, 2021

The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” Virginia Federal Court Said Challenge to NEPA Regulations Was Not Justiciable. Wild Virginia v.

Court 49

Court Statute Litigation Litigating 49