Conflict of Laws
JUNE 4, 2023
The case The parties, in this case, are (1) A British Virgin Islands company (hereinafter ‘X1’) and its judicial liquidator (hereinafter ‘X2’, collectively “Xs”) and (2) four companies having considerable estates in Dubai (hereinafter ‘Y’). Weller et al. 1983-184ff). 208/2015 of 7 October 2015 ; DSC, Appeal No.
Conflict of Laws
MARCH 29, 2023
In fact, Kea had originally advanced a cause of action for abuse of process, claiming that the alleged fraud was an abuse of process of the Kentucky Court. Kea alleges that the US default judgment is based on fabricated claims intended to defraud Kea.
Conflict of Laws
APRIL 25, 2024
5] In Three Arrows , the first defendant (‘defendant’) was a British Virgin Islands incorporated company (BVI) which was an investment fund trading and dealing in cryptocurrency. It was under liquidation proceedings in the BVI; its two liquidators were the second and third defendants in the Singapore proceedings.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content