This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A Netherlands appeals court overturned a landmark 2021 ruling requiring Shell to cut its carbon emissions by 45 percent by 2030 on Tuesday. The court cited the company’s duty of care to mitigate climate change risks. The case has been closely watched as a potential precedent for corporate climate accountability.
Austria’s Supreme Court of Justice referred four fundamental questions regarding the legality of Facebook’s collection and use of EU customers’ data to the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) on Tuesday. The Court also issued a final judgment on issues it deemed did not require a referral to the ECJ.
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) on Friday held that police officers cannot sue Crown prosecutors over actions they claim damaged their reputation. In an 8-1 decision, the SCC found that the police cannot sue Crown prosecutors for misfeasance, the wrongful exercise of lawful authority.
Any individual who obstructs the execution of the warrant could also be held liable for injuries or damage to property under civillaw, loss of their job, and pension under the National Civil Servants Act. Yoon’s legal team has filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court seeking to invalidate the warrant.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on Tuesday ruled that the Turkey government violated Article 10 freedom of expression of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) by imposing law on citizens which prosecuted them for insulting the president. The court further stated that in ?orli’s
The Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe, Germany, ruled Thursday that Berlin’s Rent Cap Act is unconstitutional as it has undermined Germany’s Basic Law. The Constitutional Court stated that the main rationale of striking down the law was procedural and did not comment on the contents of the law.
The US Supreme Court Wednesday heard oral arguments in ZF Automotive US, Inc. a case concerning federal district courts’ authority to apply a particular statute to private commercial arbitral tribunals. ” The federal district court granted Luxshare’s application, and subpoenas were sent to ZF senior officers.
In Kosovo, there are parallel schools, courts, and state offices, among other institutions, independently serving Kosovo Albanians and Kosovo Serbs. In 2003, the UN reported that “numerous problems arise” due to parallel institutions: In criminal law the most serious problem is the risk of double jeopardy.
International commercial courts —domestic courts, chambers, and divisions dedicated to commercial or international commercial disputes such as the Netherlands Commercial Court and the never-implemented Brussels International Business Court —are the topic of much discussion these days.
For over 23 years, Gonzalez & Morales Law Offices LLC has provided legal counsel on civillaw matters ranging from wills and probates to collections. Going to court now [is] great because.everything is right there in MyCase. I used to go there [to court] with literally a rolling suitcase full of paper.
In the 2018 case, the plaintiffs were found not to have standing because their interest in not suffering damage from climate change was not considered an individual interest to be protected (see Japanese Courts Admit the Operation of New Coal-Fired Power Plants in Kobe for more discussion).
RENIAC denied the request because, as noted, Peruvian civil code only allowed the unilateral registration of the children when the identity of the father was unknown, not the identity of the mother. For that reason, Ricardo Moran came to the Constitutional Court of Peru.
A Swiss court on Friday handed down the first conviction over Liberia’s 1989-1996 civil war, sentencing Alieu Kosiah to 20 years in jail for various crimes, including rape, ordering murders, and cruel treatment of civilians. The trial also marks Switzerland’s first war crimes trial in a civilian court.
Coal-Fired power plants targeted at the case, taken by Attorney Shunsuke Sugit In March 2023, two important decisions regarding the operation of newly built coal-fired power plants were handed down by courts in Japan. However, the Court rejected the Plaintiffs’ claim, ruling that the risk of harm to individuals was uncertain and not concrete.
The Supreme Court of Japan may soon weigh in on a growing field of climate litigation in Japan against coal-fired power plants. On May 6, 2022, the Citizens’ Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant filed an appeal to Japan’s Supreme Court in Citizens’ Committee on the Kobe Coal-Fired Power Plant v. Civillaw cases.
The EU Commission’s Proposal of 1 December 2021 outlines, in its introductory Recitals: “Efficient cross-border judicial cooperation requires secure, reliable and time-efficient communication between courts and competent authorities. How will this initiative improve the way in which authorities communicate?
In December 2019 the district court judge dismissed the claims against the McDonald’s Corporation stating that under f ederal and state anti-discrimination laws McDonald’s could not be held liable because Ries and three other women were employed by the franchise and not the corporation.
Based on four months of research and insights from policing officials, criminal and civillaw attorneys, and community leaders, Morganelli proposed four major changes that could form part of new legislation. Second, Morganelli recommends that courts decide whether an officer’s alleged act actually violated the Constitution.
For more than a century, characterisation has been discussed in the conflict of laws without reaching a consensus on a generally accepted theory. However, it is arguably the most crucial step for a court when determining its international jurisdiction and the applicable law.
Jones received a similar outcome in a Texas court in August ordering him to pay $45.2 In a separate order late Wednesday, Bellis temporarily blocked Jones from moving any personal assets out of the country at the request of the plaintiffs, who claimed that Jones was trying to hide assets in order to avoid paying court orders.
The book examines 15 Asian jurisdictions, representing a variety of legal systems, including civillaw (China, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, and Thailand), common law (Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Myanmar, and India), and mixed jurisdictions (Philippines and Sri Lanka). Springer, 2017) 601–611.)
Judge Siofra O’Leary, the Irish judge at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), has been elected the President of the ECHR. Judge O’Leary will be the first female President elected since the court’s establishment 63 years ago. She files this dispatch from Dublin. Her election was announced last Monday.
This paper discusses, general aspects of court-based mediation in selected regions for economically developing countries using civillaw systems. It is a broad overview.
However, as I have learned more about the procedural history preceding the decisions of the Dubai Supreme Court (“DSC”), which was not available to me when I posted my previous comment, greater emphasis will be placed on the general factual background of the case. First Appeal: DSC, Appeal No. Second Appeal: DSC, Appeal No.
Case management software is reshaping how civil litigators prepare for their cases, making it a smoother, faster, and more efficient process. In civillaw, preparation for a case is a task that demands precision, extensive research, and an acute understanding of legal intricacies.
A book edited by Kazuaki Nishioka on Treatment of Foreign Law in Asia has just been published in the Hart Studies in Private International Law -Asia. The blurb read as follows: How do Asian courts ascertain, interpret, and apply a foreign law as the law governing the merits of the case?
A coalition of human rights groups joined Wednesday WhatsApp’s lawsuit against Israeli spyware vendor NSO Group and accused the company of selling Pegasus surveillance software to government agencies to target human rights activists under the guise of terrorism laws. The groups filed an amicus brief before the U.S.
The Interpretations was adopted by the Trial Committee of the Supreme People’s Court at its 1908th meeting on December 5, 2023, which will come into force on January 1, 2024. Opening up to the outside world to push forward one step, foreign-related rule of law construction should follow one step”.
Like most of the civillaw codifications in the region, the new law focuses mainly on the so-called “patrimonial law,” i.e., property rights and obligations (contractual and non-contractual). 1783/1/Q of 30/12/1417 Hegira [November 12, 1996] ). 1783/1/Q of 30/12/1417 Hegira [November 12, 1996] ).
To provide certainty, commercial parties often conclude ex ante agreements on the venue for dispute resolution by selecting the court(s) of a particular state. However, by their very nature, implied terms offer less clarity concerning the governing law and jurisdiction agreements.
It would be imperative to take into cognizance the concept of jurisdiction which is a conglomeration of two terms, such as juris (meaning “law”) and diction (meaning “to speak”), which can be translated as presuming the appropriate forum that has the potential to “speak the law.”
The enactment was accompanied by amendments to the Rules of Court 2021, Singapore International Commercial Court Rules 2021 and Family Justice Rules 2014. Service of Singapore process through the Convention will help ease the procedure in civillaw countries, which may view service of foreign process as raising sovereignty issues.
The UK Supreme Court ruled that the cause of action in the aftermath of the 2011 Bonga offshore oil spill accrued at the moment when the oil reached the shore. On 10 May 2023, the UK Supreme Court has ruled in one of the cases in the series of legal battles started against Shell in the English courts in the aftermath of the Bonga spill.
Published in the Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal by Saloni Khanderia, Alexander von Humboldt Fellow (Experienced Researcher), Chair for CivilLaw, International Private Law and Comparative Law, Ludwig Maximilian University, München and Professor of Law, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India.
By Zhengxin Huo, Professor of Law, China University of Polit’l Science and Law; Associate Member of International Academy of Comparative Law; Observer of the UNESCO 1970 Convention. Against this background, the lawsuit before the Chinese court is more important in terms of legal analysis. Email: zhengxinh@cupl.edu.cn.
Introduction to Civil Procedure. This may also be called a civillaw class. In this class, you’re going to learn the basics of the civillaw system. You’ll learn about civillaw terms as well as how the civilcourt runs and how both of these differ from the criminal system.
When confronted with international parallel proceedings due to the existence of a competent foreign court having adjudicative jurisdiction, the seized foreign court located in common law jurisdictions seems to see it as no offence to Chinese courts by granting anti-suit injunctions to restrain Chinese proceedings.
A civillaw breakthrough came in 2021, with the ruling of a Dutch court against Shell. In Smith v Fonterra , decided by New Zealand’s Supreme Court this week, we have perhaps the biggest common law breakthrough. In this most recent ruling, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Court of Appeal’s decision.
Search and seizure is a legal procedure used mainly in common and civillaws. The findings of the search are then seized, and used in the court of law as evidence for or against the crime committed. This takes place if suspicion of, or if an actual crime has been committed.
Introduction In a previous post , I reported and commented on a decision rendered by the Abu Dhabi Supreme Court (hereinafter “ADSC”) in which the Court addressed the issue of the applicability of the Abu Dhabi Civil Marriage Law (Law No. 8/2022 of 1 February 2022) to foreign Muslims. In that case ( Appeal No.
Spanning 226 pages across six chapters, the book aims to be the leading English-language text on private international law in Indonesia. Indonesia, a civillaw country, has legal principles influenced by Dutch traditional private international law, owing to its colonial history. Pereira (Supreme Court decision 376 K/Pdt.
The Convention creates conditions for recognizing and enforcing judgements in both civil and commercial matters. It was created in 2019 to ensure that there was a legal avenue for assessing international court rulings on matters of trade. The hope of the Convention is to ensure that this process becomes more transparent.
This, in turn, facilitates the CISG’s global jurisconsultorium: whereby courts, arbitrators, lawyers, academics, and other interested stakeholders can influence and receive influence in relation to the CISG’s uniform interpretation. Instead of asking why any given court has failed to apply and respect Art. Pursuant to Art.
Saada (20-1034) will take place tomorrow (Tuesday 22 March 2022) at 10 am Washington DC time before the US Supreme Court. Please note that US courts often use the terms “ameliorative measures” and “undertakings” interchangeably (as stated in the petition). The discretion of the court is thus key. Written by Mayela Celis, UNED.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content