article thumbnail

Shell wins appeal in landmark Netherlands climate case

JURIST

In the original 2021 decision , the District Court of The Hague found that Shell had a legal obligation under Dutch civil law to align its emissions reduction targets with the goals of the 2015 Paris Climate Accords. The court cited the company’s duty of care to mitigate climate change risks.

Legal 217
article thumbnail

Europe rights court: Turkey liable for freedom of expression right violation

JURIST

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on Tuesday ruled that the Turkey government violated Article 10 freedom of expression of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) by imposing law on citizens which prosecuted them for insulting the president. The case was brought before the ECHR in 2019 by Vedat ?orli.

Court 181
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Germany top court rules Berlin rent cap is unconstitutional

JURIST

The Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe, Germany, ruled Thursday that Berlin’s Rent Cap Act is unconstitutional as it has undermined Germany’s Basic Law. The rent cap was enacted in February 2020 as an attempt by the local government to stifle rent hikes and gentrification. It froze rental rates for 1.5

article thumbnail

Human rights groups join WhatsApp suit against Israel spyware vendor

JURIST

A coalition of human rights groups joined Wednesday WhatsApp’s lawsuit against Israeli spyware vendor NSO Group and accused the company of selling Pegasus surveillance software to government agencies to target human rights activists under the guise of terrorism laws. The groups filed an amicus brief before the U.S.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court hears oral arguments in commercial arbitral tribunals case

JURIST

ZF argued that it was limited adjudicative bodies that were created by the government and that exercised authority conferred by the government. Whereas Luxshare argued that the term was to be construed more broadly, encompassing essentially anybody governed by a foreign jurisdiction and its laws.

Court 193
article thumbnail

Connecticut judge orders conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to pay $473M in punitive defamation damages for Sandy Hook comments

JURIST

Jones has faced three claims in total over his comments that the massacre was a “staged” government plot to take guns from Americans. Jones received a similar outcome in a Texas court in August ordering him to pay $45.2 million in damages to other Sandy Hook parents.

article thumbnail

Traveling Judges and International Commercial Courts

Conflict of Laws

Our article suggests that traveling judges are a nearly entirely common law phenomenon—only a handful of judges were from mixed jurisdictions and only one was a civil law judge. Common law courts may be especially amenable to traveling judges.

Court 97