Colorado Constitutional Law Laws 
JURIST
FEBRUARY 24, 2021
An independent investigation released on Monday found that Aurora, Colorado, police officers had no legal basis to stop, frisk, and use a chokehold on Elijah McClain. The report was commissioned by the City Council of Aurora and written by a panel of three experts in policing, constitutional law, and emergency medicine.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 27, 2023
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday threw out the conviction of Billy Raymond Counterman, a Colorado man who was sentenced to four-and-a-half years in prison for stalking based on his Facebook messages. She canceled appearances, started to carry a gun, and eventually left Colorado for the east coast.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 1, 2024
Constitutional law took center stage in many U.S. Elenis that the First Amendment prohibited Colorado from forcing a website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees. Supreme Court and the New Jersey Supreme Court cases decided in 2023. A divided Court held in 303 Creative LLC v.
JonathanTurley
JULY 23, 2022
As various states move to pass controversial new gun control laws after the decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, one such law was just enjoined by a federal court in Colorado. and Wyoming, correctly found that the law clearly ran afoul of the controlling precedent.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JULY 19, 2023
Colorado , 600 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. 18–3–602(1)(c), a Colorado statute making it unlawful to “[r]epeatedly. Following Colorado law, the trial court rejected that argument under an objective standard, finding that a reasonable person would consider the messages threatening. The Colorado Supreme Court denied review.
Constitutional Law Reporter
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
Colorado , which involves the standard for determining when statements are “true threats” that are not protected by the First Amendment. 723 (2015), but ultimately decided the case before reaching the constitutional issue. 723 (2015), but ultimately decided the case before reaching the constitutional issue. ” C.W.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JANUARY 6, 2025
Federal civilian employees are entitled to differential pay when performing active duty “pursuant to a call or order to active duty under a provision of law referred to in section 101(a)(13)(B) of title 10.” Eagle County, Colorado : The case involves how to interpret the Courts prior decision in Department of Transportation v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
152 
Let's personalize your content