This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“The Legal Merits of the Colorado Supreme CourtDecision Don’t Matter”: Eric Levitz has this post at the “Intelligencer” blog of New York magazine. The post “The Legal Merits of the Colorado Supreme CourtDecision Don’t Matter” appeared first on How Appealing.
Eagle County, Colorado. In Seven County, backers of a proposed train linking Utah oilfields to refineries on the Gulf Coast ask the justices to overturn a lower courtdecision blocking the project and narrow the scope of what environmental impacts the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act requires agencies to review.
The Preamble We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower courtdecision on Monday rejecting an environmental challenge to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
In the third quarter of 2024, Colorado's banking and financial services sector faced both regulatory updates and changes to state law due to recent federal courtdecisions — with consequences for local governments, mortgage lenders, state-chartered trust companies and federally chartered lenders serving Colorado consumers, says Sarah Auchterlonie at (..)
The feature uses ChatGPT to deliver one-paragraph summaries of courtdecisions, with the goal of enabling legal professionals to more quickly gauge the relevance and implications of a decision. “This ensures users get precise insights into relevant courtdecisions,” Twigger said.
The Colorado Supreme Court has unanimously rejected a proposal that would fix a decades-old legal standard that has made it easy for attorneys to exclude people of color, especially African Americans, from serving on juries, reports the Colorado Sun. The 1986 U.S.
He writes on his Election Law Blog about one document in those papers — a 2004 memo to Justice Stevens from his then-clerk (and current California Supreme Court Justice) Leondra Kruger. The memo recommended that Stevens vote to deny certiorari of the Colorado Supreme Courtdecision in Colorado General Assembly v.
At its last conference, it granted review of a one-time relist asking whether federal courts must follow state law requiring medical malpractice claims to be supported by an expert affidavit. The court also agreed to take up a twice-relisted challenge to Colorados ban on conversion therapy.
A Colorado attorney asked the Tenth Circuit to reverse a U.S. Tax Courtdecision that prevented him from deducting $303,000 in advertising expenses tied to his automobile racing, saying the lower court incorrectly ruled that the costs were related to a hobby rather than his litigation practice.
Colorado , 600 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that to establish that a statement is a “true threat” unprotected by the First Amendment, the state must prove that the defendant had some subjective understanding of the statements’ threatening nature, based on a showing no more demanding than recklessness. In Counterman v.
The state appeals court affirmed, in reliance on a Massachusetts Supreme Courtdecision that held a jury may observe a defendant’s conduct during trial. Believing that the jury’s question resulted in the difference in outcome, Ruiz challenged the consideration of his courtroom demeanor on appeal. Counterman v.
also a Navajo Nation citizen, on the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation, which is located in Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Denezpi, a citizen of the Navajo Nation, is accused of a July 2017 sexual offense against V.Y., Code of Federal Regulations.
In total, at least 25 cases have been filed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai’i, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Vermont. The Supreme Court sided with the fossil fuel company defendants, ruling that appellate courts could review all grounds of the remand order.
After a few slow weeks on the relist front, the Supreme Court came roaring back this week with four newly relisted petitions that, if granted, will likely be added to the March 2023 argument calendar. Colorado , 22-138. Two years ago, in United States v. relisted after the Nov. 18 and Dec. 2 conferences). Counterman v.
Numerous courts in the years since have agreed with that position – allowing secured creditors to enforce their liens on the proceeds of a sale of an FCC license (both broadcast and non-broadcast licenses) in bankruptcy, and the FCC's own practice and its discussions of related issues in subsequent cases seem to confirm this position.
The Tenth Circuit upheld the district courtdecision in favor of the IRS and its authority to conduct the audit. Thomas noted that in 2005 a fractured divided court ruled Gonzales v. Peter Hermes, Kevin Desilet, Samantha Murphy, and John Murphy refused to verify their tax liabilities because they feared criminal prosecution.
A sheriff’s sergeant in Colorado also read the FBI bulletin and, weeks later, asked Adams to analyze a 911 tape from a widow suspected of killing her husband. Local police asked the Colorado Bureau of Investigation to help find out who did it. She and Harpster wrote a report of their findings. “OK
Exxon Mobil Corporation (Exxon) argued to the federal district court for the Southern District of New York that its lawsuit against the attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts to bar their investigations into Exxon’s climate change-related disclosures should not be dismissed. ADDITION TO THE NON-U.S. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia granted BLM’s and federal officials’ motion for voluntary remand without vacatur of claims that they failed to comply with NEPA in connection with 27 oil and gas leasing decisions across Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, and Montana between September 2016 and March 2019.
Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing a website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees. Ultimately, the district court held that Smith was not entitled to the injunction she sought. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.
We’ll see if the court is persuaded. Elenis , 21-476 , presenting a recurring question the court first confronted in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. Moving on to potential blockbusters that don’t explicitly call on the court to overrule precedent. Then there’s 303 Creative LLC v. They invoke Rapanos v.
While the Supreme Court routinely throws out lower-courtdecisions granting prisoners habeas relief, its fairly uncommon for the justices to summarily grant relief to habeas petitioners. City of Carbondale, Illinois , 24-57 Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Hill v. Relisted after the Nov. 10 and Jan. 10 and Jan.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled Thursday that a federal statute requiring people to be 21 to purchase handguns from Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) conflicts with previous Supreme Courtdecisions and the Second Amendment.
After District Court Declined to Enjoin Coal Company’s Road-Building Activities in Colorado, Tenth Circuit Entered Temporary Injunction. Forest Service adopted the North Fork Exception to the Colorado Roadless Rule in 2016, allowing for road construction related to coal mining in the Sunset Roadless Area. Bernhardt , No.
Colorado Federal Court Remanded Local Governments’ Climate Case to State Court. District Court Rejected Climate Change Arguments in Challenge to Listing Determination for Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout. The federal district court for the District of Colorado rejected arguments that the U.S. Rhode Island v.
Supreme Court will review a Colorado Supreme Courtdecision disqualifying Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s 2024 ballot on grounds he violated section 3 of the federal Constitution’s 14th amendment by engaging in insurrection. There have been many amicus curiae briefs submitted in Trump v.
City of Englewood, New Jersey , 23-1189 Issues : (1) Whether the City of Englewoods speech-free buffer zones, including zones outside an abortion clinic, violate the First Amendment; and (2) whether the court should overrule Hill v. City of Carbondale, Illinois , 24-57 Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Hill v. 13 and Jan.
A series of Supreme Courtdecisions have weighed in on the 1971 laws campaign-spending rules. Valeo , the court struck down the limits on independent expenditures but generally upheld the limits on contributions. A quarter-century later, in 2001, the court in FEC v. In its landmark 1976 ruling in Buckley v.
The question came to the court in the case of Ryan Carter , who was a member of the Air National Guard when he underwent spine surgery at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., A federal district court dismissed Carters claims, relying on the courtsdecision in Feres.
In December, six amicus briefs were filed in support of Baltimore—by state and local government groups, environmental groups, six senators, law professors who teach and write on civil procedure and the federal courts, 19 states and the District of Columbia, and Boulder County, San Miguel County, and the City of Boulder in Colorado.
A recent Pew Research Center survey found that more Americans view the Supreme Court as ‘friendly’ toward religion and that LGBTQ Americans reported harm to their communities following recent Supreme Courtdecisions. .
The US Supreme Court has begun hearing oral arguments in former President Donald Trump’s appeal of a Colorado Supreme Courtdecision to remove the former president from the state’s primary election ballot in the upcoming 2024 presidential election cycle. The landmark case of Trump v.
Former President Donald Trump filed an appeal Wednesday asking the US Supreme Court to reverse the Colorado Supreme Courtdecision barring him from the state’s ballot. The original decision will now be on hold until the US Supreme Court rules on the appeal.
Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. Lawsuit Challenged Master Development Plan for Oil and Gas Development in Colorado.
Additionally, cases that reversed lower courtdecisions or set new legal precedents were considered more significant. Case Outcome: Reversal of Lower CourtDecision: 5 points. Affirmation of Lower CourtDecision: 2 points. El Paso County, Colorado (CA10) This case was brought by Ms. Ludlow Sch.
After the developers terminated the Keystone XL pipeline project, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on July 16, 2021 dismissed for lack of jurisdiction an appeal of the district court’s denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction barring work on the pipeline. Pro Se Constitutional Climate Suit Filed in Colorado Federal Court.
The district court found the analysis of greenhouse gas and climate change impacts to be adequate but remanded for consideration of alternatives that did not involve leasing all nominated parcels. The conservation groups’ appeal of the district courtdecision is still pending, with the opening brief due on July 12.
Facts of the Case Six months before the March 5, 2024, Colorado primary election, four Republican and two unaffiliated Colorado voters filed a petition against former President Trump and Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold in Colorado state court.
DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. Parties Voluntarily Dismissed Appeals of Federal CourtDecision Requiring More Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The court found that both parties were entitled to intervene as of right. 20-1530 (U.S. 29, 2021); North American Coal Corp. 20-1531 (U.S. Haaland , No.
The Colorado Republican State Central Committee (CRSCC) filed a petition for a writ of certiorari Wednesday to overturn the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision which removed former president Donald Trump from the 2024 Republican primary ballot. I’m very happy with the ruling. I felt they read the Constitution.
District Court Said Plaintiffs Could Proceed with Title V Permit Claim Against Coal Mine Operator. Federal Court Dismissed Challenge to Colorado Dam Project Authorizations for Lack of Jurisdiction. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) actions authorizing a dam project in Colorado be brought in a federal court of appeal.
Although the question comes to the court in a case from Colorado, the impact of the court’s ruling could be much more far-reaching. 27, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to review a lower-courtdecision that allowed Trump to appear on the state’s primary ballot. 6, 2021, attacks on the U.S. And on Dec.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content