This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
But the Court does not grant review to correct factbound errors, it emphasized and in any event, the lower courtsdecision was correct. His case, along with the others granted on Monday, will likely be argued in the fall, with a decision to follow sometime next year.
City of Englewood, New Jersey , 23-1189 Issues : (1) Whether the City of Englewoods speech-free buffer zones, including zones outside an abortion clinic, violate the First Amendment; and (2) whether the court should overrule Hill v. City of Carbondale, Illinois , 24-57 Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Hill v. 10 conference.)
That brings us to this weeks conference, in which there are 143 petitions and applications on the Supreme Courts docket. Government contractors defenses to torts The GEO Group, Inc. The class action alleged violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and Colorado common law prohibitions against unjust enrichment.
McCarthy had plenty of evidence to contradict that conclusion, including her driver's license from Colorado, where she had lived before Arizona. As Reason 's Billy Binion notes , subsequent Supreme Courtdecisions make it doubtful whether Bivens claims are viable in practice. the Westfall Act. the Westfall Act.
At its last conference, it granted review of a one-time relist asking whether federal courts must follow state law requiring medical malpractice claims to be supported by an expert affidavit. The court also agreed to take up a twice-relisted challenge to Colorados ban on conversion therapy.
A series of Supreme Courtdecisions have weighed in on the 1971 laws campaign-spending rules. Valeo , the court struck down the limits on independent expenditures but generally upheld the limits on contributions. A quarter-century later, in 2001, the court in FEC v. In its landmark 1976 ruling in Buckley v.
While the Supreme Court routinely throws out lower-courtdecisions granting prisoners habeas relief, its fairly uncommon for the justices to summarily grant relief to habeas petitioners. City of Carbondale, Illinois , 24-57 Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Hill v. Relisted after the Nov. 10 and Jan. 10 and Jan.
Sixth Circuit : It was attorney error or strategic miscalculation to waive his tort claims back in 2019. Dissent: His attorneys would have to be clairvoyant to have foreseen the 2021 Supreme Courtdecision that dinged his constitutional claims; he should be permitted to unwaive his tort claims. [Ed.:
Colorado Federal Court Remanded Local Governments’ Climate Case to State Court. District Court Rejected Climate Change Arguments in Challenge to Listing Determination for Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout. The federal district court for the District of Colorado rejected arguments that the U.S. Rhode Island v.
Supreme Court denied fossil fuel companies’ petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s 2018 denial of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change nuisance cases to California state court.
Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. Lawsuit Challenged Master Development Plan for Oil and Gas Development in Colorado.
District Court Said Plaintiffs Could Proceed with Title V Permit Claim Against Coal Mine Operator. Federal Court Dismissed Challenge to Colorado Dam Project Authorizations for Lack of Jurisdiction. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) actions authorizing a dam project in Colorado be brought in a federal court of appeal.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content