SCOTUSBlog

JULY 2, 2021

Montana Department of Revenue , the Supreme Court ruled that although states are not required to subsidize private education, states that choose to do so cannot exclude religious schools from receiving funding simply because they are religious. A new case on public funding and religious education. Last year, in Espinoza v.

Compensatory Damages 139

Compensatory Damages Court Education Court Rules 139

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 22, 2021

Before trial, the district court rejected Struve’s argument that the officers had violated the Fourth Amendment in pulling him over without reasonable suspicion because they could not tell whether he was texting or using his cellphone legally. In his petition, Tuggle argues that the U.S. Lamoureux v. Bethany Hospice and Palliative Care LLC.

Court 108

Court Statute Laws Court Rules 108

JonathanTurley

JULY 27, 2021

The Tenth Circuit decision reaffirms a growing conflict among the circuits and offers an especially strong case for the Court to consider such a major reframing of such conflicts. The Court disappointed many when it found an off-ramp in the Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. See supra, III.B.1.

Court 59

Court Laws Manufacturing Statute 59

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 30, 2022

Colorado Civil Rights Commission (relisted 14 times). As a statistical matter , a case that the Supreme Court repeatedly relists is more likely to be the subject of an opinion respecting denial or — where existing precedent is clear — a summary reversal or vacatur. Issue : Whether the statute of limitations for a 42 U.S.C.

Stare Decisis 108

Stare Decisis Court Felony Statute 108

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 7, 2017

The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. The court granted the company leave to amend its complaint with 21 days. Save the Colorado v. Resolute Forest Products, Inc. Greenpeace International , No.

Court 40

Court Attorney Technology Assisted Review Legal 40

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 11, 2023

Groff sued USPS in federal court under Title VII for refusing to accommodate his religious beliefs and practices. The trial court ruled for the Postal Service under Hardison , and the U.S. Colorado , 22-138. Groff asks the justices to revisit and overrule Hardison ’s more-than-de-minimis-cost test. 6 conference).

Government 102

Government Court Legal Legal 102

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 7, 2019

Colorado Federal Court Remanded Local Governments’ Climate Case to State Court. District Court Rejected Climate Change Arguments in Challenge to Listing Determination for Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout. The federal district court for the District of Colorado rejected arguments that the U.S. Rhode Island v.

Court 40

Court Statute Government Tort 40

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 2, 2024

The statute is below. Colorado, the Supreme Court ruled that criminal threats must be based on a showing of a culpable mental state. Here is the statute: 13-1202. The quote is clearly a reference to Cheney going to war and how she would feel about it. Once again, I do not like the tenor or the name-calling.

Felony 85

Felony Statute Misdemeanor Attorney 85

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2020

If the renewal license was an order, the First Circuit asked the state court to address whether the CCA expressly preempted the ordinance challenged in this case. Swiss Court Ruled that Imminent Danger of Climate Crisis Justified Protesters’ Actions. City of Oakland v.

Court Reporting 40

Court Reporting Court Government Construction 40

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 16, 2025

Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit affirmed , holding that because a federal agency now has the final say over how the private horse-racing authority implements the federal statute, the amended law did not impermissibly delegate authority to a private entity. In a one-paragraph order, the justices granted the authoritys request.

Tort 105

Tort Statute Court Laws 105

Above The Law

MARCH 21, 2025

In a series of recent decisions, federal courts across the United States have addressed a range of significant legal issues, from civil rights and constitutional law to administrative authority and criminal justice. El Paso County, Colorado (CA10) This case was brought by Ms. Among them are Griffith v. Griffith v.

Court 74

Court Contract Government Education 74

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2021

A magistrate judge in the federal district court for the District of Colorado recommended that the court grant an underground coal mine operator’s motion to dismiss a Clean Air Act citizen suit that alleged the mine required a Prevention of Significant Deterioration construction permit and a Title V operating permit.

Court Reporting 45

Court Reporting Construction Court Government 45

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JUNE 8, 2021

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.

Court 45

Court Statute Government Litigation 45

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 9, 2021

With respect to federal-officer jurisdiction, the district court noted that this case was similar to County of San Mateo v. in which the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court finding that the federal-officer removal statute did not provide jurisdiction. Save the Colorado v. Chevron Corp. CV-19-08285 (D.

Court 64

Court Litigation Litigating Construction 64

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 3, 2024

Trump prevailed outright earlier this year in his challenge to a ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court that would have allowed him to be removed from the state’s ballot as an insurrectionist because of his role in the Jan. United States , the justices narrowed the scope of a federal criminal statute under which hundreds of Jan.

Court 102

Court Drafting Statute Laws 102

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The court further found that EPCA’s legislative history did not support the plaintiff’s “expansive interpretation.” The cases were filed in 2016 , 2020 , and 2021.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40