Remove Colorado Remove Court Rules Remove Tort
article thumbnail

Justices consider next steps in murder case in which prosecution admits error

SCOTUSBlog

At its last conference, it granted review of a one-time relist asking whether federal courts must follow state law requiring medical malpractice claims to be supported by an expert affidavit. The court also agreed to take up a twice-relisted challenge to Colorados ban on conversion therapy.

Court 96
article thumbnail

October 2019 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Colorado Federal Court Remanded Local Governments’ Climate Case to State Court. District Court Rejected Climate Change Arguments in Challenge to Listing Determination for Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout. The federal district court for the District of Colorado rejected arguments that the U.S. Rhode Island v.

Court 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

In a slew of new cases, the justices take in closer look

SCOTUSBlog

They contended that it would seem to follow from Apprendi that a jury must find any facts necessary to support a (nonzero) restitution order, and they suggested that the court should take up a lower court ruling to the contrary. City of Carbondale, Illinois , 24-57 Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Hill v.

Tort 107
article thumbnail

MSNBC Analyst Calls for Liability for Boebert and Carlson … for the Colorado Shootings

JonathanTurley

Lauren Boebert (R-CO) and Fox News host Tucker Carlson to face civil liability for their commentary on transgender policies or controversies after the recent tragic shooting in Colorado. The most obvious form of civil liability would be some type of tort action. The Court in cases like New York Times v. In Brandenburg v.

Tort 58
article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

A magistrate judge in the federal district court for the District of Colorado recommended that the court grant an underground coal mine operator’s motion to dismiss a Clean Air Act citizen suit that alleged the mine required a Prevention of Significant Deterioration construction permit and a Title V operating permit.

article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

In addition, the court found that the company had failed to show that the alleged RICO violations proximately caused injury to its business or property. The court also dismissed defamation and related state tort claims. On October 4 , the federal district court for the Northern District of California vacated the U.S.

Court 40
article thumbnail

June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district court rulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.

Court 45