Remove Colorado Remove Felony Remove Immigration Remove Laws
article thumbnail

Justices asked to review Arizona’s life-without-parole sentencing scheme for youths

SCOTUSBlog

This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether Arizona’s sentencing law for juvenile offenders convicted of first-degree murder violates Miller because, although the law allows for the possibility of release, the state abolished parole for homicide in 1994.

article thumbnail

Reviving the ‘Power of a Pardon’

The Crime Report

There have been more than 250 new laws passed in that 18-month period alone — amazing state efforts to roll back the malign effects of the 30-year crime war,” the CCRC details. On a more broad spectrum, a pardon may be necessary to enable anyone to run for elected office, or simply secure a professional or business license.

Felony 98
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Florida man subject to lifetime sex-offender registration requirements argues that he is “in custody” for purposes of federal post-conviction laws

SCOTUSBlog

The failure to comply with these requirements is a felony under Florida law. Pennsylvania’s law governing requirements for registered sex-offenders, he writes, “is in all relevant respects the same as Florida’s.” In 2017, Clements went to federal court, seeking to challenge the constitutionality of his conviction. Clements v.

Laws 108
article thumbnail

Criminalizing Migration: How We Got Here

The Crime Report

needs to radically change existing immigration laws and policies to shift away from the mindset of “migrant sorting” by criminal status, according to a paper published in the Daedalus journal. Immigration and Criminal Justice Intertwined. The presidency of Donald Trump augmented this trend and brought it to public attention.

article thumbnail

Court grants review in new batch of cases, including dispute on religious rights of employees

SCOTUSBlog

Federal law prohibits employers from firing workers for practicing their religion unless the employer can show that the worker’s religious practice cannot “reasonably” be accommodated without “undue hardship.” The justices granted review in 11 new cases for a total of eight hours of oral argument. Counterman v. Garland and Garland v.

Court 116