Remove companies cato-institute
article thumbnail

Venue (and Changing Venue) in Criminal Trade Secret Cases

Patently O

In the case, the Gov’t asked for an effects test — arguing that the company StrikeLines felt the effect of the theft in Pensicola. The Conservative Rutherford Institute and Libertarian Cato Institute joined with the National Association of Public Defenders in an amicus brief. ” U.S. Smith , 22 F.4th

article thumbnail

Supreme Court on Patent Law: November 2023

Patently O

Vidal , No 23-135 This case involves a challenge to a PTO rule, known as the “ Fintiv rule,” that sets restrictive standards governing when the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) will deny institution of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. Fortinet, No. Reduxio Systems, Inc., and others in the District of Delaware.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Out At Home: FDA’s Vocal Support of Home Testing but Reluctance to Clear Novel OTC Home Tests

FDA Law Blog

Cato & Jeffrey N. This type of public spat does not instill confidence in companies developing or investing in OTC IVDs. Companies are also experiencing significant regulatory obstacles with another related category: home collection devices. By McKenzie E. Gibbs & Allyson B.

article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Renewable Fuel Companies Asked D.C. Renewable fuel companies and trade groups filed a motion requesting that the D.C. The companies filed their brief on November 16, arguing that the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that it was limited to reviewing removal based on the federal-officer removal statute. Wheeler , No.

Court 59