This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari in three new cases Wednesday, including two cases about compensation for student-athletes. The court consolidated the cases NationalCollegiateAthleticAssociation v. Alston and American Athletic Conference v. Thanks for your support! DONATE NOW.
A group of Democratic Senators introduced legislation Thursday that would establish a federal commission to supervise college athletics and to grant student-athletes extensive compensation rights, including profit-sharing. For student-athletes who maintain a 2.2 However, the bill would essentially abolish NIL restrictions.
The announcement that the justices would tackle significant issues relating to antitrust protection for the NationalCollegiateAthleticAssociation and class-action lawsuits came just two days after the justices released their second set of orders from their private conference on Dec. companies cannot do business.
Yesterday, I wrote about the history of the NCAA’s assembling of the rights to an array of trademarks associated with this month’s basketball tournament. Again, importantly, none of these restrictions prevents media companies from using any of the marks in providing customary news coverage of or commentary on the tournament.
4, June/July 2022, by the American Bar Association. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association or the copyright holder. Published in Landslide , Vol.
Yesterday, I wrote about the history of the NCAA’s assembling of the rights to an array of trademarks associated with this month’s basketball tournament. Endorsements by Individual Student-Athletes. However, there is no national set of rules as to what is permissible. Rather, the right of publicity is governed by state law.
Less than a week ago, the NationalCollegiateAthleticAssociation filed a trademark infringement action in federal court against a company that runs an online sports-themed promotions and contests under the marks “April Madness” and “Final 3.” Clearly, such activities continue to carry great risks.
As we have previously reported, the NationalCollegiateAthleticAssociation (NCAA) is very serious about taking action against anyone who may try to trade off the goodwill in its March Madness marks — even if the NCAA’s actual marks are not used. Clearly, such activities continue to carry great risks.
And it was always the sentiment of those with whom I’ve interacted that the firm is incredibly team-oriented and collegial, and that they have enjoyed their firm’s strong platform. I also saw Blank Rome as a great national platform to serve my current clients. David’s an expert in guiding an athlete through an endorsement deal.
” The Fourth District, Division Two, published opinion , disagreeing with the Third District decision in Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. NationalCollegiateAthleticAssociation. Sales tax vote denial The court also opted not to hear Alameda County Taxpayers’ Association v.
judge on Monday rejected arguments that he should recuse himself from hearing a lawsuit challenging a collegiateathleticassociation’s policy on the participation of transgender athletes because of a courtroom protocol he adopted recommending lawyers refer to people by their preferred pronouns. Find them all here.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content