This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The justices on Wednesday dismissed a dispute over a securities fraud case brought against graphics chip maker NVIDIA. Shareholders argued that NVIDIA did not disclose the extent to which sales to crypto-miners, rather than gaming companies, put their shares at risk. The court heard NVIDIACorp v.
“Supreme Court Seems Ready to Allow Securities Fraud Case Against Nvidia; The case, which is in an early stage, accused the giant technology company of misleading investors about its exposure to the cryptocurrency industry”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” The U.S. ” The U.S. .”
chip maker NvidiaCorp., Microsoft Corp. The groups prey on the systems companies have set up to operate efficiently during an era of remote work, targeting company help desks and the systems companies use to reset passwords and remotely access corporate networks. and others.
NVIDIACorp. stockholders launched a long-pending derivative suit Thursday seeking damages on the company's behalf for alleged director and officer insider trading and failure to fully disclose the volatility behind booming sales of specialized graphic processing boards to cryptocurrency miners.
Namely, rank-and-file workers decried the hefty pay packages doled out to C-suite occupants, while executives fired back with arguments that their performance and value to their companies justified their compensation. Importantly, the rule carves out space for a company-selected measure, which may include non-GAAP performance measures.
Supreme Court on Wednesday to argue a closely watched case that could change the pleading standards shareholders have to meet to sue companies like NvidiaCorp. Two former BigLaw colleagues and a onetime Consumer Financial Protection Bureau litigator are set to appear before the U.S.
Supreme Court justices on Wednesday seemed to regret the decision to hear a dispute between chipmaker NvidiaCorp. and its investors, wondering whether a disagreement over what the company knew about its sales to crypto miners has any bearing on other securities class action lawsuits.
Chip manufacturer NvidiaCorp. Supreme Court victory over investors who accuse the company of downplaying its reliance on the crypto mining market, arguing that a lower court decision allowing the case to move forward "eviscerates the guardrails that Congress erected to protect the public from abusive securities litigation."
The alarm bells are sounding as an Oxford Economics survey of businesses found that companies see geopolitical tensions as the top risk to the global economy over the next two years. Here are a few examples of how companies are portraying their concerns about geopolitical tensions in recent SEC filings. NvidiaCorp.
Delaware's Supreme Court has reversed a Chancery Court ruling that upheld stockholder document demands for a probe of alleged insider trading by top NVIDIACorp. figures, finding that the company was unfairly denied access to witnesses and their statements before trial.
The Federal Trade Commission's complaint challenging NvidiaCorp.'s alleges the move would give one of the largest and most valuable computing companies in the world ownership over technology that's crucial to its rivals. s planned $40 billion purchase of Arm Ltd.
An attorney for tech companyNVIDIACorp. urged the Delaware Supreme Court on Wednesday to clarify the precision required for stockholder books and records demands, arguing the Delaware chancellor relied on vague justifications and hearsay in a broad document turnover order last year.
We can now draw from real-life examples for a better understanding of how companies are addressing the SEC’s requests for more information. regarding the company’s Form 10-K for 2022 offers a sense of what the SEC wants to see in corporate disclosures about inflation. and technology manufacturer NVIDIACorp.
But the company countered that the sales reps were “outside salesmen,” who are exempt from the overtime requirement. The issue that the justices agreed to decide was whether the company must provide “clear and convincing evidence” that the exemption applies, or whether it must merely make that showing by a preponderance of the evidence.
The fear is that a few well-resourced companies have already gobbled up most of the market power over the latest transformative technology. The Federal Trade Commission already began an inquiry in January seeking more information from major tech companies regarding their investments and partnerships across the AI sector. “We
Similarly, to permit them to do public works projects in the Philadelphia area, Stamatios Kousisis and his company, Alpha Painting & Construction Co., used as a front a company that qualified as a “disadvantaged business enterprise,” though the DBE performed no actual work. ” In NVIDIACorp.
NvidiaCorp v. 13) — What pleading standards apply to show knowledge or intent for securities-fraud claims that rely on internal company documents. United States (Nov. Ohman J:or Fonder AB (Nov. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
Share The justices closed the November session on Wednesday with NVIDIACorp v. Ohman J:or Fonder AB , a case arising out of the use of NVIDIA chips by crypto miners. Investors say the company did not disclose the extent to which sales to crypto-miners put their shares at risk.
Share The world’s most valuable company is before the justices today for oral arguments in NVIDIACorp. Ohman J:or Fonder AB. Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content