article thumbnail

US Supreme Court declines North Carolina appeal in undercover investigations case

JURIST

Provided the employer prevailed in a lawsuit, they could have sought attorney’s fees, compensatory damages, and exemplary damages of $5,000 for each day a defendant acted in violation of the statute. ” Second, North Carolina argued that the case presented important questions of First Amendment law.

article thumbnail

The Evolving Legal Landscape for Geologic Carbon Sequestration in the United States

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

In such situations, the owner of the surface estate has rights to use the surface of the land, such as for constructing buildings, but does not own the underlying mineral resources (e.g., a tort claim), the maximum amount of damages recoverable as compensatory damages is per person and not per occurrence.

Legal 64
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court takes three cases and depublishes three opinions; dissenting votes in four review denials

At the Lectern

83 — and where the Attorney General has knowledge of, or is in actual or constructive possession of, such evidence — what duty, if any, does the Attorney General have to acknowledge or disclose that evidence to the petitioner? The appellate court concluded the Rule doesn’t limit attorney fees, disagreeing with Lafferty v.

Court 49
article thumbnail

Australia High Court Delivers Major Blow to Free Speech In Defamation Ruling

JonathanTurley

This has long been a controversial element under the FCA because it was largely the result of judicial not congressional construction. compensatory damages and $300,000.00 punitive damages. 47 U.S.C. § We discussed this issue in relation to the Sixth Circuit’s arguments in Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment.

Tort 43
article thumbnail

October 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The federal district court for the Eastern District of Texas denied a steel mill owner’s motion for a preliminary injunction barring construction of a gas pipeline that will cross the plaintiff’s property. Federal Court Denied Preliminary Injunction in Steel Mill Owner’s Pipeline Challenge. The owner asserted that the U.S. BP America Inc. ,

Court 72
article thumbnail

November 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Tenth Circuit ordered the injunction to remain in place pending consideration of the environmental groups’ appeal of a district court order that declined to vacate mining lease modifications that authorized road construction in the Sunset Roadless Area. County of Maui v. Sunoco LP , No. 2CCV-20-0000283 (Haw. Sierra Club v.

article thumbnail

February 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

After Denying Motions to Stop Construction Activities in National Petroleum Reserve, Alaska Federal Court Enjoined Certain Work for Two Weeks. On February 6, the court issued an injunction on certain construction activities through February 20 or until the Ninth Circuit rules on any motions for injunction pending appeal. 2019-398 (Vt.