This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
by Salih Okur (University of Augsburg) On 8 and 9 March, scholars from more than a dozen different jurisdictions followed the invitation of Tobias Lutzi to discuss recent trends in punitivedamages at the University of Augsburg, Germany. The conference contained five panels overall, which were split into three blocks.
The damages in the case could be massive but Young had to satisfy the higher NewYork Times v. Judge Roberts found that “Young sufficiently proffered evidence of actual malice, express malice, and a level of conduct outrageous enough to open the door for him to seek punitivedamages.”
The aforementioned UK case is a good example, because one key to ensuring the enforcement of English judgments is the reciprocal relationship between China and England (or the UK, if in a wider context), which, under the de jure reciprocity test (one of the new three tests), was confirmed in this case.
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision decades ago in NewYork Times v. compensatorydamages and $300,000.00 punitivedamages. American courts have long recognized that broad defamation rule are inimical to free speech.
Share This week we highlight petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether an award of punitivedamages that doubles the compensatorydamages can comport with due process and how a defendant can prove ineffective assistance of counsel in rejecting a plea offer. On appeal, the U.S.
in which Epic has asked the justices to weigh in on whether a state law that places a cap on punitivedamages can provide the kind of fair notice that the Supreme Court has said the Constitution’s due process clause requires, so that a punitivedamages award that complies with the law passes constitutional muster.
The State seeks compensatorydamages, penalties for violation of the Consumer Fraud Act, attorneys’ fees, punitivedamages, and costs of suit. Plaintiff in Securities Action Against Exxon Said Decision Against NewYork Attorney General Should Not Affect this Case. BP America Inc. , N20C-09-097 (Del.
involving whether punitivedamages that are twice compensatorydamages and fall within a state’s statutory punitivedamages cap are constitutionally excessive. NewYork allows the admission of testimonial hearsay to prove an aggravating factor at a capital sentencing hearing. 27 and Oct.
President Donald Trump has failed to persuade a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit accusing him of making defamatory statements about five Black and Hispanic men who were wrongly convicted and imprisoned for the 1989 rape of a white jogger in NewYork’s Central Park. Philadelphia-based U.S.
Alina Habba filed the letter after the publication of a NewYork Post article in which an unnamed source stated that Judge Kaplan had a previous “mentor type” relationship with the plaintiff’s lead counsel, Roberta Kaplan (no relation). .” million in compensatorydamages and $65 million in punitivedamages.
Below is my column in The Hill on the $355 million verdict against Trump and his corporation in NewYork. The damages in my view are excessive and absurd after the court acknowledged that no one lost a dime in these exchanges. NewYork Gov. The impact on NewYork business is likely to be dire.
A NewYork federal judge rejected former US President Donald Trump’s request for a new trial or judgment in his favor on Thursday in the defamation case won by E. million in compensatory and $65 million in punitivedamages—but Judge Lewis Kaplan found his motion “without merit.”
The testimony put the controversial demands of NewYork Attorney General James into sharp relief. Those words from Alice in Wonderland seem the only apt description of the case unfolding in the NewYork courtroom of Justice Arthur F. That may be a common practice in NewYork real estate, but it is not a good practice.
Lacewell , a challenge to a NewYork regulation that requires employers to fund abortions through their employee health plans. involving whether punitivedamages that are twice compensatorydamages, and fall within a state’s statutory punitivedamages cap, are constitutionally excessive.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content