Connecticut Contract Statute 
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 14, 2024
Petitioners Neal Bissonnette and Tyler Wojnarowski owned the rights to distribute Flowers products in certain parts of Connecticut. To purchase those rights, they entered into contracts with Flowers that require any disputes to be arbitrated under the FAA. goods across borders via the channels of foreign or interstate commerce.”
Conflict of Laws
NOVEMBER 22, 2023
courts apply a presumption against extraterritoriality to limit the reach of federal statutes. 2023), the Supreme Court held that federal statutes should be presumed to apply only to conduct in the United States unless those statutes clearly indicate that they apply extraterritorially. Second, U.S. Hectronic International, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Broadcast Law Blog
OCTOBER 9, 2016
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and is a significant victory for the FTC and its co-plaintiff, the State of Connecticut. The decision in this case, FTC v. LeadClick Media, LLC , comes from the U.S.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 6, 2017
The court said the statutory language authorized courts to grant stays and that EPA’s reading of the statute “would have the perverse result of empowering this court to act when the agency denies a stay but not when it chooses to grant one.” Second Circuit Rejected Challenges to Connecticut Renewable Energy Programs. S241948 (Cal.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
OCTOBER 20, 2020
1442, or the civil-rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. The district court rejected eight grounds for removal, but the Fourth Circuit concluded its appellate jurisdiction was limited to determining whether the companies properly removed the case under the federal-officer removal statute. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore , No.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
Connecticut ; Requested “Tutorial” on Climate Change. Connecticut ) and Ninth Circuit ( Native Village of Kivalina v. Jacobson’s lawsuit asserted defamation, breach of contract, and promissory estoppel claims. ExxonMobil Corp. applied federal common law.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content