Remove Connecticut Remove Court Decisions Remove Tort
article thumbnail

July 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Supreme Court denied fossil fuel companies’ petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s 2018 denial of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change nuisance cases to California state court. Connecticut v. 21-01752 (8th Cir.).

Court 48
article thumbnail

June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. Connecticut v. After the Supreme Court’s decision in BP p.l.c.

Court 44
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Second Circuit Takes on the Clean Air Act’s International Air Pollution Provision and Climate Change

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The court correctly noted that, under the Supreme Court’s holding in American Electric Power v. Connecticut ( AEP ), the Clean Air Act has displaced federal common law related to domestic GHG emissions.

Statute 75
article thumbnail

April 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Connecticut , 564 U.S. The Second Circuit then held that the Clean Air Act, in turn, displaced federal common law claims related to domestic emissions. The Second Circuit cited American Electric Power Co.

Court 120