This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled on Tuesday that the Second Amendment of the Constitution protects non-violent offenders from federal firearm bans. The case resulted from Bryan Range’s appeal from the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Hardiman authored the opinion of the court.
“Connecticut Supreme Courtrules pandemic-era video trials pass Constitutional muster. Mahony of The Hartford Courant has this report on three related rulings that the Supreme Court of Connecticut issued Monday. What does this mean going forward?” ” Edmund H.
The United States Supreme Court Monday denied the appeal of Ramin Khorrami, an Arizona man who was convicted of fraud before an eight-member jury. Six states in the US allow for trials before six or eight-person juries in felony cases: Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts and Utah.
The South Dakota Supreme Court Wednesday ruled that a state constitutional amendment legalizing recreational marijuana is unconstitutional. In February, the circuit court dismissed the election contest. On appeal, the South Dakota Supreme Court affirmed.
However, in 2017 a federal appeals courtruled that the FCC did not have the authority to do so because intrastate calls are not within the FCC’s jurisdiction. A bill that would allow incarcerated individuals to make free phone calls is pending in the Connecticut state legislature.
In a landmark ruling regarding how colleges handle sexual assault allegations, Connecticut’s highest courtruled that a former Yale student can proceed with a defamation lawsuit against his accuser who had accused him of rape but was later exonerated in criminal court, Dave Collins reports for the Associated Press.
Amazon has asked Connecticut's highest court not to reframe certified Second Circuit questions about whether its employees must be paid while walking to mandatory anti-theft screenings at the ends of their shifts, arguing that state courtrules ban them from altering the circuit's words.
million stipulated judgment a couple won after alleging that certain officials of a company Liberty insured defrauded them into investing, a Connecticut state courtruled, finding that covering the judgment would violate state public policy. A Liberty Mutual unit has no duty to cover an approximately $1.9
The Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, which owns and operates the Foxwoods Resort Casino in Connecticut, did not meet a key burden when suing its insurer for more than $76 million in losses tied to the COVID-19 pandemic, the state's intermediate-level appeals courtruled Thursday in declining to revive the litigation.
As a legal professional, timing is everythingespecially when it comes to meeting critical court deadlines. Weve prepared this guide to 2025 court holidays as a go-to resource to help you proactively mark critical dates in your calendar to ensure that youre always one step ahead of the clock. So when is your brief due?
s Pratt & Whitney division and several of its aerospace subcontractors can continue, a Connecticut federal courtruled, rejecting the companies' bid to toss out allegations that they worked together to restrict hiring and suppress salaries. A proposed antitrust class action against Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s
Courts have rules governing when you can request documents, what you can request, how to address objections, etc. It is extremely important you review the rules relevant to your state, or frequently familiarize yourself with Federal rules if you handle those types of matters. Monitor your deadlines!
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Friday that four cisgender girls do not have standing to challenge the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Association’s (CIAC) policy , which allows transgender athletes to compete in sports according to their gender identity.
.” Putting aside the obvious violation of the sanctity of the confessional, it presents a novel problem for priests if they both encourage the faithful to unburden themselves while at the same time reminding them anything that they say can and will be used against them in a court of law. The Court also later handed down Burwell v.
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a lower courtruling Thursday that held inmates in Connecticut prisons do not have a First Amendment right to view or possess pictorial sexually explicit materials. The court also found the directive to be neutral in its application.
Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Third, the court found that BLM used internally inconsistent emission rates. In 2018, the court vacated EPA’s earlier denial of the request.
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. The court therefore found that the stay was unauthorized and vacated it. FEATURED CASE. A divided D.C. DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS.
“Connecticut Gov. Supreme Courtruling awaits”: Christopher Keating of The Hartford Courant has this report. Lamont pledges to sign key abortion bill passed by House as U.S.
Jones regularly repeated false information about the Sandy Hook shooting and refused to follow courtrules. Jones didn’t attend court Wednesday, instead reacting belligerently on his show: “All made up. He failed to produce records that would have shown if InfoWars profited from Sandy Hook coverage. Hilarious,” Jones said. “So
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The Supreme Court is back. On Monday, the court granted nine petitions from the enormous number that built up over the summer. A short explanation of relists is available here. First up is Buffington v.
The US Supreme Courtruled 6-3 Friday in Dobbs v. The trial court granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs, blocking the law. Thomas Dobbs, the State Health Officer for the Mississippi Department of Health, then appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Wade and Planned Parenthood v.
Additionally, travel distance is a known barrier to care that jeopardizes health, which the court recognized in 2016 in Whole Woman’s Health v. Thirteen have “trigger laws” enacted after 1973 that forbid doctors from providing abortions upon the court overturning Roe , half of which have sprung into effect. Hellerstedt.
Kevin Kelly and his girlfriend Regina Jones went to a Halloween party at the Rustic Café in Old Lyme, Connecticut in 2018. On June 15, 2023, the court issued the ultimate judgment not only on the torts claims but perhaps the state of our politics. They were dressed as Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels. Six Flags St.
New York, Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey filed suit, arguing that the new law violated the Constitution — specifically, Article I, Section 8 , and the 10th and 16th Amendments — because it interfered with states’ sovereign taxing authority by unduly coercing them to change their sovereign tax policies and by denying them equal sovereignty.
Kevin Kelly and his girlfriend Regina Jones went to a Halloween party at the Rustic Café in Old Lyme, Connecticut into 2018. On June 15, 2023, the court issued the ultimate judgment not only on the torts claims but perhaps the state of our politics. That is the allegation of Waterbury, Connecticut police who say that Jason A.
The Supreme Court has made clear that, subject to the exception for impeachment, the president’s power to grant pardons is “unlimited,” with virtually no oversight or limiting role for Congress. When there is a full pardon, the Supreme Court has explained, it is as if the defendant never committed the crime. In Burdick v.
Federal Court Denied Oakland and San Francisco Motions to Return Climate Change Nuisance Cases to State Court; Found Federal Common Law of Nuisance Could Apply, Despite AEP v. Connecticut ; Requested “Tutorial” on Climate Change. It demands to be governed by as universal a rule of apportioning responsibility as is available.”
Richard Ashby Wilson, associate law school dean at the University of Connecticut, said “Trump crossed the Rubicon and incited a mob to attack the U.S. Ohio , where the Supreme Court stressed that even “advocacy of the use of force or of law violation” is protected unless it is imminent. Trump’s Jan.
In Baltimore’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies, Supreme Court Held that Appellate Review of Remand Order Extends to All Grounds for Removal. The Court declined to review the companies’ other grounds for removal, finding that the “wiser course” was to allow the Fourth Circuit to address them in the first instance.
Christopher Poller was a suspect Waterbury, Connecticut police officers were seeking to arrest. Heres what that looked like in action, as pictured in the lower courts decision : With the camera engaged, the officer was able to see what looked like two guns inside the car. The trial court decided it wasnt.
Several states and private plaintiffs went to federal court to challenge the plan, and in February 2016 the Supreme Court, dividing 5-4, put the plan on hold before it could go into effect. A different set of plaintiffs challenged the Trump EPA’s decision to repeal the Clean Power Plan, as well as its adoption of the ACE Rule.
The OMB memorandum was immediately challenged in multiple lawsuits, temporarily stayed by two federal district courts, and then rescinded. This may be due in part to the fact that the underlying Executive Order still stands, and in part to the governments failure to comply with the court orders. In State of New York v.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Supreme Court reversed an intermediate appellate court’s decision affirming a superior court determination that the defendant could not present a necessity defense.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content