Connecticut Diligence Statute Tort 
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 2, 2021
The Court held that the provision used “extension” in its “temporal sense,” but that the statute did not impose a “continuity requirement” and instead allowed small refineries to apply for hardship extensions “at any time.” In re Enbridge Energy, LP , Nos.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
APRIL 9, 2021
Connecticut , 564 U.S. In Minnesota, the district court granted the State of Minnesota’s motion to remand its case, which asserts state law claims under common law and consumer protection statutes. s consumer protection statute. The Second Circuit cited American Electric Power Co.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
.png)
45 
Let's personalize your content