Connecticut Litigating Statute 
FDA Law Blog
JANUARY 4, 2022
Several states, including Connecticut, California, District of Columbia , Massachusetts , and Nevada, have adopted or incorporated the Code in their statutes or regulations. Another reason drug manufacturers may want to update their marketing policies are the numerous state requirements tied to the Code. Other jurisdictions like D.C.
Conflict of Laws
MAY 17, 2023
There are state courts and federal courts, state statutes and federal statutes, state common law and federal common law. A clause is contrary to public policy when a statute or a judicial decision declares that enforcement is inconsistent with the policy of the state. The United States legal system is immensely complex.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Trademark & Copyright Law
APRIL 24, 2020
For decades, a trademark owner’s chances of recovering an infringer’s profits in litigation varied depending on where the case was pending. Since Fossil did not act willfully, the District Court for the District of Connecticut refused to award Romag the profits that Fossil had earned as a result of the trademark infringement.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MAY 23, 2018
Climate change nuisance litigation is entering a new and dynamic phase. The decisions on these motions could influence pending and future litigation in the same vein – lawsuits seeking damages, compensation or abatement funds to alleviate the costs borne by local governments to adapt to climate change impacts. By Michael Burger.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 14, 2024
Petitioners Neal Bissonnette and Tyler Wojnarowski owned the rights to distribute Flowers products in certain parts of Connecticut. All this “complexity and uncertainty” would “‘breed[] litigation from a statute that seeks to avoid it.’” Facts of the Case Respondent Flowers Foods, Inc.
Conflict of Laws
NOVEMBER 22, 2023
courts apply a presumption against extraterritoriality to limit the reach of federal statutes. 2023), the Supreme Court held that federal statutes should be presumed to apply only to conduct in the United States unless those statutes clearly indicate that they apply extraterritorially. Second, U.S. Hectronic International, Inc.
Broadcast Law Blog
OCTOBER 9, 2016
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and is a significant victory for the FTC and its co-plaintiff, the State of Connecticut. The decision in this case, FTC v. LeadClick Media, LLC , comes from the U.S. All other defendants except one settled with the FTC long ago.). LeadClick’s Defense Under the FTC Act.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content