This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google. The Fourth Circuit had previously upheld a trial courtdecision that South Carolina waived its Eleventh Amendment protections against subpoenas by participating in the federal lawsuit.
Supreme Court upheld the Protecting Americans from Foreign Controlled Applications, which will require TikTok to shut down in the United States unless its Chinese parent company divests its interest. The Courtsdecision in TikTok Inc. Garland , 604 U.S. _ (2025), was unanimous. TikTok Inc.s parent company is ByteDance Ltd.,
In May, the Hamburg Max Planck Institute organized an online panel to discuss implications from the German Federal ConstitutionalCourtDecision on the Act to Combat Child Marriages rendered just prior.
Wisconsin Supreme CourtsDecision CCB and the sub-entities sought judicial review. The post Supreme Court to Consider Tax Exemptions for Religious Organizations appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.
Share Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting ConstitutionalLaw: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights , edited by Professors M.C. Mirow and Howard Wasserman.
Lower CourtsDecision The district court dismissed the case under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which generally bars suits against firearms companies based on criminals misusing their products. A decision is expected before the end of the term in June/July 2025.
In a 5-2 decision, the Kenya Court of Appeal on Friday upheld a Kenya High Courtdecision declaring the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), a constitutional amendment bill, unconstitutional. The court expressed that the said doctrine limits the amendment power set out in Articles 255-257 of the Constitution.
Wade has been settled law during her entire career. In this article Biehl succinctly and expertly identifies how the upcoming Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs V. Kathy Biehl is a lawyer licensed in two states, as well as a prolific multidisciplinary author and writer.
In response to the courtsdecision, the Louisiana Legislature adopted a new redistricting map via by Senate Bill 8 (SB8), which established a second majority-Black congressional district to resolve the Robinson litigation. A decision is expected by the end of the term in June/July. Please check back for updates.
In the past 20 years, the court has announced substantive constitutionallaw, pleading requirements, and timeliness rules that make it harder to win such arguments. It particularly disfavors Eighth Amendment litigation attacking familiar lethal injection protocols as “cruel and unusual” punishment.
The post SCOTUS Rules Double Jeopardy Bans Retrial of Defendant Found Non-Guilty by Reason of Insanity appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “This bright-line rule exists,” she emphasized, “to preserve the jury’s ‘overriding responsibility.
Both laws also require platforms to provide individualized explanations for certain forms of content moderation and mandate that platforms provider general disclosures about their content-moderation practices. In the Florida case, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction in part.
347 (1964), in which the Court held that “an unforeseeable and unsupported state-courtdecision on a question of state procedure does not constitute an adequate ground to preclude this Court’s review of a federal question.” However, according to the majority, the case is an exception under Bouie v.
Supreme Court Upholds CFPB Funding Scheme appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “And, it specifies the objects for which the Bureau can use those funds—to ‘pay the expenses of the Bureau in carrying out its duties and responsibilities.’” The post U.S.
Each suit premised jurisdiction on district courts’ ordinary federal-question authority to resolve “civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.” The post Supreme Court Greenlights Pre-enforcement Challenges to FTC and SEC Proceedings appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The Supreme Court went on to find that Delaware’s various arguments as to why the Disputed Instruments should not qualify as “other similar written instrument[s]” within the meaning of §2503 were unpersuasive. The post Delaware Loses Bid to Keep Uncashed MoneyGram Checks appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
After concluding that §1415( l ) did not preclude Perez’s ADA lawsuit, it remanded the matter back to the lower court. The post SCOTUS Sides With Deaf Student in ADA Suit appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The Supreme Court next addressed the Government’s argument that several prior Courtdecisions establish that the provision is jurisdictional. According to the majority, none of the three decisions definitively interpreted §2409a(g) as jurisdictional.
While not binding, lower courts may be influenced by his reasoning. The post SCOTUS Issues Term’s First Decision – Finds ADA Case Moot appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. According to Justice Thomas, Laufer’s “claim d[id] not assert a violation of a right under the ADA, much less a violation of her rights.”
The Supreme Court is expected to issue opinions in the cases prior to the end of the Term in June. The post SCOTUS Concludes Oral Arguments for the Term appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Please check back for updates.
According to the dissenters, the majority’s decision has the potential to be “profoundly destabilizing.” “ Any established government regulation about any issue — say, workplace safety, toxic waste, or consumer protection — can now be attacked by any new regulated entity within six years of the entity’s formation,” Justice Jackson wrote.
According to the Court, this requirement “undermines any attempt to give the provision a sweeping, open-ended construction,” instead limiting §1 to its appropriately “narrow” scope. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Reach of FAA Exemption for Transportation Workers appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Notably, the Court’s narrow decision did not directly address the merit of the Rogers test or when it may be appropriate to apply. The post SCOTUS Sides With Jack Daniels in Dog Toy Trademark Dispute appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Notably, the Court did not address whether the out-of-court statements Longoni conveyed were testimonial. The issue must now be addressed by the lower court. The post Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Confrontation Clause to Forensic Analysis appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
“The Constitution’s Eighth Amendment serves many important functions, but it does not authorize federal judges to wrest those rights and responsibilities from the American people and in their place dictate this Nation’s homelessness policy,” he wrote.
According to Kagan, the majority, in “one fell swoop,” has given “itself exclusive power over every open issue — no matter how expertise-driven or policy-laden — involving the meaning of regulatory law.” The post Divided Supreme Court Strikes Down Chevron in Landmark Decision appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The District Court granted Cruz and his Committee summary judgment on their constitutional claim, holding that the loan-repayment limitation burdens political speech without sufficient justification, and dismissed as moot their challenges to the regulation. Supreme CourtDecision.
The post Supreme Court Holds Retaining Excess Value Violated Takings Clause appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “A taxpayer who loses her $40,000 house to the State to fulfill a $15,000 tax debt has made a far greater contribution to the public fisc than she owed.
According to the majority, BSA and its regulatory scheme suggests the “law aims to provide the government with a report sufficient to tip it to the need for further investigation, not to ensure the presentation of every detail or maximize revenue for each mistake.”
While the Court acknowledged that “hard and fast limits on retroactive benefits can create harsh results,” it also emphasized that Congress has the power to choose between rules, which prioritize efficiency and predictability, and standards, which prioritize optimal results in individual cases.
“This Court has never accepted such a boundless theory of standing.” The post SCOTUS Rules Plaintiffs Lack Standing to Challenge Government’s Alleged Social Media Censorship appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The post SCOTUS Clarifies Court Must Resolve Competing Arbitration Provisions appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. To hold otherwise would be to impermissibly ‘elevate [a delegation provision] over other forms of contract.’”
Notably, that issue is before the Court in a pending petition for certiorari in Hearst Newspapers, LLC v. The post SCOTUS Holds No Time Limit for Damages Under Copyright Act appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Martinelli.
The post SCOTUS Rules FBI Must Face Lawsuit Over No-Fly List appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. As the case unfolds, the complaint’s allegations will be tested rather than taken as true, and different facts may emerge that may call for a different conclusion.”
SYMPOSIUM: Fundamental Rights and Private International Law Ralf Michaels: Einleitung zum Symposium: Grundrechte und IPR im Lichte der Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zum Kinderehenbekämpfungsgesetz, 707–713, DOI: [link] [Open Access: CC BY-SA 4.0]
Both opinions applied the standard of review of the federal Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which is highly deferential to state courtdecisions. The divided decision was in Fauber v. Davis , which comes after the Supreme Court affirmed the death penalty for a 1986 murder ( People v. Fauber (1992) 2 Cal.4th
The Court remanded the case back to the lower courts to assess whether Gonzalez’s evidence suffices to satisfy the Nieves exception. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Standard for Retaliatory Arrest Claims appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
“Together, the surety and going armed laws confirm what common sense suggests: When an individual poses a clear threat of physical violence to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Because McIntosh did not challenge the lower courts’ harmlessness analysis in either his certiorari petition or his opening brief, the Court did not revisit it. The post Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The post SCOTUS Sides With California Developer in Takings Case appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. It found the same is true for issues concerning whether the parties’ other arguments are preserved and how those arguments bear on Sheetz’s legal challenge.
The post Supreme Court Rules Federal Agencies Can Be Sued Under Fair Credit Reporting Act appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “Both provisions thus exempt government agencies from the Act’s otherwise-broad definition of ‘person’ for particular reasons in particular contexts,” he emphasized.
Finally, the Court emphasized that nothing prohibits universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected the applicant’s life, so long as that discussion is concretely tied to a quality of character or unique ability that the particular applicant can contribute to the university.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content