This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google. The Fourth Circuit had previously upheld a trial courtdecision that South Carolina waived its Eleventh Amendment protections against subpoenas by participating in the federal lawsuit.
According to the appeals court, holding otherwise would give businesses a blueprint for using corporate formalities to insulate their infringement from financial consequences. Supreme CourtsDecision The Supreme Court disagreed. The justices left it to the lower courts to address any new theories.
Supreme Court upheld the Protecting Americans from Foreign Controlled Applications, which will require TikTok to shut down in the United States unless its Chinese parent company divests its interest. The Courtsdecision in TikTok Inc. Garland , 604 U.S. _ (2025), was unanimous. TikTok Inc.s parent company is ByteDance Ltd.,
However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the citys petition for review. Supreme CourtsDecision The Supreme Court reversed by a vote of 5-4. The post SCOTUS Rules Against EPA in Clean Water Case appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Wisconsin Supreme CourtsDecision CCB and the sub-entities sought judicial review. The post Supreme Court to Consider Tax Exemptions for Religious Organizations appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.
The majority of the Supreme Court is once again shifting their interpretation of the law in order to support right-wing political objectives! More law schools are kicking USNWR rankings to the curb. . 2022 was the year that ConstitutionalLaw dramatically shifted (to the right). [ ABA Journal ].
Lower CourtsDecision The district court dismissed the case under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which generally bars suits against firearms companies based on criminals misusing their products. A decision is expected before the end of the term in June/July 2025.
In a 5-2 decision, the Kenya Court of Appeal on Friday upheld a Kenya High Courtdecision declaring the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), a constitutional amendment bill, unconstitutional. The court expressed that the said doctrine limits the amendment power set out in Articles 255-257 of the Constitution.
Wade has been settled law during her entire career. In this article Biehl succinctly and expertly identifies how the upcoming Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs V. Kathy Biehl is a lawyer licensed in two states, as well as a prolific multidisciplinary author and writer.
Supreme Court agreed to keep the federal government’s Title 42 policy in place while legal challenges continue. By a vote of 5-4, the justices stayed a lower courtdecision that would have lifted the policy on December 21, 2022. Alejandro Mayorkas et al.,
However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the citys petition for review. Supreme CourtsDecision The Supreme Court reversed by a vote of 5-4. The post SCOTUS Rules Against EPA in Clean Water Case appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Supreme Court held that alleging commingling of funds alone cannot satisfy the commercial nexus requirement of the expropriation exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA). The Courtsdecision was unanimous. Supreme CourtsDecision The Supreme Court disagreed.
In response to the courtsdecision, the Louisiana Legislature adopted a new redistricting map via by Senate Bill 8 (SB8), which established a second majority-Black congressional district to resolve the Robinson litigation. A decision is expected by the end of the term in June/July. Please check back for updates.
Both laws also require platforms to provide individualized explanations for certain forms of content moderation and mandate that platforms provider general disclosures about their content-moderation practices. In the Florida case, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction in part.
Supreme Court Upholds CFPB Funding Scheme appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “And, it specifies the objects for which the Bureau can use those funds—to ‘pay the expenses of the Bureau in carrying out its duties and responsibilities.’” The post U.S.
Each suit premised jurisdiction on district courts’ ordinary federal-question authority to resolve “civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.” The post Supreme Court Greenlights Pre-enforcement Challenges to FTC and SEC Proceedings appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The Supreme Court went on to find that Delaware’s various arguments as to why the Disputed Instruments should not qualify as “other similar written instrument[s]” within the meaning of §2503 were unpersuasive. The post Delaware Loses Bid to Keep Uncashed MoneyGram Checks appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
After concluding that §1415( l ) did not preclude Perez’s ADA lawsuit, it remanded the matter back to the lower court. The post SCOTUS Sides With Deaf Student in ADA Suit appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The Supreme Court next addressed the Government’s argument that several prior Courtdecisions establish that the provision is jurisdictional. According to the majority, none of the three decisions definitively interpreted §2409a(g) as jurisdictional.
The Supreme Court is expected to issue opinions in the cases prior to the end of the Term in June. The post SCOTUS Concludes Oral Arguments for the Term appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Please check back for updates.
According to the dissenters, the majority’s decision has the potential to be “profoundly destabilizing.” “ Any established government regulation about any issue — say, workplace safety, toxic waste, or consumer protection — can now be attacked by any new regulated entity within six years of the entity’s formation,” Justice Jackson wrote.
According to the Court, this requirement “undermines any attempt to give the provision a sweeping, open-ended construction,” instead limiting §1 to its appropriately “narrow” scope. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Reach of FAA Exemption for Transportation Workers appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Notably, the Court’s narrow decision did not directly address the merit of the Rogers test or when it may be appropriate to apply. The post SCOTUS Sides With Jack Daniels in Dog Toy Trademark Dispute appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Notably, the Court did not address whether the out-of-court statements Longoni conveyed were testimonial. The issue must now be addressed by the lower court. The post Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Confrontation Clause to Forensic Analysis appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
“The Constitution’s Eighth Amendment serves many important functions, but it does not authorize federal judges to wrest those rights and responsibilities from the American people and in their place dictate this Nation’s homelessness policy,” he wrote.
According to Kagan, the majority, in “one fell swoop,” has given “itself exclusive power over every open issue — no matter how expertise-driven or policy-laden — involving the meaning of regulatory law.” The post Divided Supreme Court Strikes Down Chevron in Landmark Decision appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
” The post SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. And to tell the state that it must redraw District 1, this time without targeting African-American citizens.”
The District Court granted Cruz and his Committee summary judgment on their constitutional claim, holding that the loan-repayment limitation burdens political speech without sufficient justification, and dismissed as moot their challenges to the regulation. Supreme CourtDecision.
The post Supreme Court Holds Retaining Excess Value Violated Takings Clause appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “A taxpayer who loses her $40,000 house to the State to fulfill a $15,000 tax debt has made a far greater contribution to the public fisc than she owed.
According to the majority, BSA and its regulatory scheme suggests the “law aims to provide the government with a report sufficient to tip it to the need for further investigation, not to ensure the presentation of every detail or maximize revenue for each mistake.”
While the Court acknowledged that “hard and fast limits on retroactive benefits can create harsh results,” it also emphasized that Congress has the power to choose between rules, which prioritize efficiency and predictability, and standards, which prioritize optimal results in individual cases.
The post SCOTUS Clarifies Court Must Resolve Competing Arbitration Provisions appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. To hold otherwise would be to impermissibly ‘elevate [a delegation provision] over other forms of contract.’”
Notably, that issue is before the Court in a pending petition for certiorari in Hearst Newspapers, LLC v. The post SCOTUS Holds No Time Limit for Damages Under Copyright Act appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Martinelli.
The post SCOTUS Rules FBI Must Face Lawsuit Over No-Fly List appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. As the case unfolds, the complaint’s allegations will be tested rather than taken as true, and different facts may emerge that may call for a different conclusion.”
The Court remanded the case back to the lower courts to assess whether Gonzalez’s evidence suffices to satisfy the Nieves exception. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Standard for Retaliatory Arrest Claims appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
“Together, the surety and going armed laws confirm what common sense suggests: When an individual poses a clear threat of physical violence to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote. The post SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Because McIntosh did not challenge the lower courts’ harmlessness analysis in either his certiorari petition or his opening brief, the Court did not revisit it. The post Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The post SCOTUS Sides With California Developer in Takings Case appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. It found the same is true for issues concerning whether the parties’ other arguments are preserved and how those arguments bear on Sheetz’s legal challenge.
The post Supreme Court Rules Federal Agencies Can Be Sued Under Fair Credit Reporting Act appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “Both provisions thus exempt government agencies from the Act’s otherwise-broad definition of ‘person’ for particular reasons in particular contexts,” he emphasized.
Finally, the Court emphasized that nothing prohibits universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected the applicant’s life, so long as that discussion is concretely tied to a quality of character or unique ability that the particular applicant can contribute to the university.
“What is most important is that “undue hardship” in Title VII means what it says, and courts should resolve whether a hardship would be substantial in the context of an employer’s business in the common-sense manner that it would use in applying any such test.”
The post Supreme Court Clarifies First Amendment Test for True Threats appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. But in declining one of those two alternative paths, something more important is gained: Not ‘having it all’—because that is impossible—but having much of what is important on both sides of the scale.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content