This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from the South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism (SCDPR) challenging a lower courtruling that found the state had waived sovereign immunity by participating in a federal antitrust lawsuit against Google.
The post Supreme CourtRules Bribery Statute Doesn’t Criminalize Gratuities for Past Acts appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “The bribery statute for federal officials, §201(b), uses the term ‘corruptly.’ But the gratuities statute for federal officials, §201(c), does not.”
The post Supreme CourtRules Federal Agencies Can Be Sued Under Fair Credit Reporting Act appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. “Both provisions thus exempt government agencies from the Act’s otherwise-broad definition of ‘person’ for particular reasons in particular contexts,” he emphasized.
In a 2-1 panel decision, the court also found that the was overly broad. In so ruling, the appellate court reversed a January 2019 district courtdecision.
Supreme Courtruled that public officials may be held liable for their social media activity in certain circumstances. The District Court found that because Freed managed his Facebook page in his private capacity, and because only state action can give rise to liability under §1983, Lindke’s claim failed. In Lindke v.
In analyzing the two essential elements of an FCA violation — the falsity of the claim and the defendant’s knowledge of the claim’s falsity — the District Courtruled against SuperValu on the falsity element. The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings.
Supreme Courtruled that the National Rifle Association (NRA) may continue its First Amendment lawsuit against the former head of New York’s Department of Financial Services. The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Second Circuit to evaluate the NRA’s claims in accordance with its opinion.
The Tenth Circuit upheld the district courtdecision in favor of the IRS and its authority to conduct the audit. Thomas noted that in 2005 a fractured divided courtruled Gonzales v. Raich , 545 U.S.
What is most striking however is the coverage in the Washington Post, which reported on the summary affirmance but only quoted supporters for the challenge, including a strikingly misleading take on the lower courtruling upheld by the Supreme Court. Again, that constitutional option has never been in doubt and never debated.
Muñoz’s position would usher in a new strain of constitutionallaw, for the Constitution does not ordinarily prevent the government from taking actions that “indirectly or incidentally” burden a citizen’s legal rights,” Justice Barrett wrote. “She
Supreme Courtruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. The post Supreme CourtRules States Can’t Challenge Federal Immigration Policy appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. In United States v.
Beshear has correctly cited a major victory recently before the Kentucky Supreme Court — an unanimous decision in favor of his authority to issue pandemic orders. On November 12, 2020, the Kentucky Supreme Courtruled unanimously in favor of the authority of the governor to issue pandemic orders.
They have asked for the dismissal of the indictment for lack of jurisdiction since the Courtruled in Dobbs that “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.” The court’s other citation is to a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in J ane L.
The family courtdecision was reviewed by Judges Stan Pritzker, John Egan Jr., They admit that the rock was “not addressed by family court or the attorney for the child, the mother’s testimony at the hearing, as well as an exhibit admitted into evidence.” However, the mother’s home was left as the child’s residence.
Notre Dame Law Professor Nicole Garnett has been involved in the case and the Notre Dame Religious Liberty Clinic is on the brief for St. The lower courtruled that such funding of a religious school is unconstitutional. Here is the lower courtdecision: St. The case will be argued in April. Isidore Opinion
But the Convention came together to declare that equal rights, including rights for women and LGBTQ+ people, should be a fundamental value of American constitutionallaw. It was in response to the Supreme Courtdecision Kelo v. The fourth and final amendment to pass was an amendment limiting eminent domain. New London.
” The Courtruled that “it is a highly appropriate function of a public school education to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive terms in public discourse.” ” While the Court had found that “F**k the Draft” was protected for adults in Cohen v. Grandville Cent. 2d 1043, 1057 (2d Cir.
But it also is a generally-worded statute that can be interpreted broadly, and I expect a split in courtdecisions — and that only increases the likelihood of a Supreme Court review. Ironically, the Supreme Court warned against such sudden agency “finds” of regulatory authority.
As it has in the past, the court adopted a three-tiered approach to presidential powers based on the source of a presidential action. Sawyer , in which the courtruled against President Harry Truman’s takeover of steel mills. Chief Justice John Roberts cited Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co.
After major rulings on gun rights, abortion and climate change, Democratic leaders and pundits declared the court to be “illegitimate.” Madison in 1803, when the courtruled that it must be the final arbiter of what the law means. For example, after the courtruled in Worcester v.
However, Arroyos ADA claim had already been decided in his favor, and the only remaining issue was his state law claim for damages under the Unruh Act. Decision The Ninth Circuit reversed the district courtsdecision to dismiss the Unruh Act claim, ruling that the federal court should have kept jurisdiction over it.
The decision in Folajtar v. The Attorney General of the United States may be one of the most perfectly tailored case for major Supreme Courtdecision. Indeed, the only thing lacking from the 2-1 decision is a mailing label directly to Justice Amy Coney Barrett. McDonald v. City of Chicago , 561 U.S. at 626–27).
In a series of recent decisions, federal courts across the United States have addressed a range of significant legal issues, from civil rights and constitutionallaw to administrative authority and criminal justice. Area of Law: ConstitutionalLaw, Civil Rights, Federal Authority: 25 points.
The threat to the free press is obvious and was the basis for foundational courtdecisions. The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in New York Times v. Like “disinformation,” it is heavily laden with subjectivity.
Below is my column in The Hill on the over-wrought reaction to the Supreme Courtdecision in Trump v. Commentators seemed to compete for the most alarmist accounts from court-sanctioned death squads to political assassinations to the death of democracy. United States.
These civil lawsuits actually raise claims like the infliction of emotional distress that were directly and unequivocally rejected by the Supreme Court. In 2011, the courtruled 8-1 in favor of Westboro Baptist Church, an infamous group of zealots who engaged in homophobic protests at the funerals of slain American troops.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Ninth Circuit declined to remand with instructions for dismissal of the underlying action and also declined to vacate any district courtdecisions. BP p.l.c. ,
While I am a critic of Trump’s speech and actions on that day, I still believe that the the court is completely wrong on the First Amendment. We need to put this insidious legal theory to rest with the finality and clarity of a Supreme Courtdecision. In Brandenburg v. I hope that she does. Griswald
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content