Constitutional Law Reporter

OCTOBER 7, 2024

Muñoz’s position would usher in a new strain of constitutional law, for the Constitution does not ordinarily prevent the government from taking actions that “indirectly or incidentally” burden a citizen’s legal rights,” Justice Barrett wrote. “She

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Court Constitutional Law 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

JULY 12, 2023

Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. The post Supreme Court Rules States Can’t Challenge Federal Immigration Policy appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. In United States v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Court Entertainment 52

JonathanTurley

JUNE 29, 2021

The Tenth Circuit upheld the district court decision in favor of the IRS and its authority to conduct the audit. Thomas noted that in 2005 a fractured divided court ruled Gonzales v. Raich , 545 U.S.

Government 39

Government Court Legal Legal 39

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Beshear has correctly cited a major victory recently before the Kentucky Supreme Court — an unanimous decision in favor of his authority to issue pandemic orders. On November 12, 2020, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the authority of the governor to issue pandemic orders.

Attorney 29

Attorney Litigation Litigating Entertainment 29

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 5, 2021

What is most striking however is the coverage in the Washington Post, which reported on the summary affirmance but only quoted supporters for the challenge, including a strikingly misleading take on the lower court ruling upheld by the Supreme Court. Again, that constitutional option has never been in doubt and never debated.

Court 40

Court Court Reporting Education Court Reporter 40

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

They have asked for the dismissal of the indictment for lack of jurisdiction since the Court ruled in Dobbs that “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.” The court’s other citation is to a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in J ane L.

Court 44

Court Laws Statute Contract 44

JonathanTurley

MAY 9, 2021

The family court decision was reviewed by Judges Stan Pritzker, John Egan Jr., They admit that the rock was “not addressed by family court or the attorney for the child, the mother’s testimony at the hearing, as well as an exhibit admitted into evidence.” However, the mother’s home was left as the child’s residence.

Court 47

Court Government Court Decisions Court Rules 47

JURIST

MAY 27, 2024

But the Convention came together to declare that equal rights, including rights for women and LGBTQ+ people, should be a fundamental value of American constitutional law. It was in response to the Supreme Court decision Kelo v. The fourth and final amendment to pass was an amendment limiting eminent domain. New London.

Government 197

Government Laws Court Construction 197

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 9, 2024

As it has in the past, the court adopted a three-tiered approach to presidential powers based on the source of a presidential action. Sawyer , in which the court ruled against President Harry Truman’s takeover of steel mills. Chief Justice John Roberts cited Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co.

Court 75

Court Calendaring Government Court Decisions 75

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

But it also is a generally-worded statute that can be interpreted broadly, and I expect a split in court decisions — and that only increases the likelihood of a Supreme Court review. Ironically, the Supreme Court warned against such sudden agency “finds” of regulatory authority.

Court 38

Court Statute Small Business Lawyer 38

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 30, 2024

” The Court ruled that “it is a highly appropriate function of a public school education to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive terms in public discourse.” ” While the Court had found that “F**k the Draft” was protected for adults in Cohen v. Grandville Cent. 2d 1043, 1057 (2d Cir.

Court 50

Court Drafting Education Attorney 50

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 25, 2020

The decision in Folajtar v. The Attorney General of the United States may be one of the most perfectly tailored case for major Supreme Court decision. Indeed, the only thing lacking from the 2-1 decision is a mailing label directly to Justice Amy Coney Barrett. McDonald v. City of Chicago , 561 U.S. at 626–27).

Felony 55

Felony Government Court Laws 55

JonathanTurley

JULY 8, 2024

Below is my column in The Hill on the over-wrought reaction to the Supreme Court decision in Trump v. Commentators seemed to compete for the most alarmist accounts from court-sanctioned death squads to political assassinations to the death of democracy. United States.

Court 52

Court Law School Laws Court Decisions 52

JonathanTurley

JULY 4, 2022

After major rulings on gun rights, abortion and climate change, Democratic leaders and pundits declared the court to be “illegitimate.” Madison in 1803, when the court ruled that it must be the final arbiter of what the law means. For example, after the court ruled in Worcester v.

Court Rules 41

Court Rules Court Laws Court Decisions 41

JonathanTurley

APRIL 19, 2021

These civil lawsuits actually raise claims like the infliction of emotional distress that were directly and unequivocally rejected by the Supreme Court. In 2011, the court ruled 8-1 in favor of Westboro Baptist Church, an infamous group of zealots who engaged in homophobic protests at the funerals of slain American troops.

Criminal Law 62

Criminal Law Laws Law School Legal 62

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Ninth Circuit declined to remand with instructions for dismissal of the underlying action and also declined to vacate any district court decisions. BP p.l.c. ,

Court 40

Court Litigating Litigation Government 40

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 27, 2020

The threat to the free press is obvious and was the basis for foundational court decisions. The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in New York Times v. Like “disinformation,” it is heavily laden with subjectivity.

Laws 41

Laws Tort Law School Constitutional Law 41

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 18, 2023

While I am a critic of Trump’s speech and actions on that day, I still believe that the the court is completely wrong on the First Amendment. We need to put this insidious legal theory to rest with the finality and clarity of a Supreme Court decision. In Brandenburg v. I hope that she does. Griswald

Court 63

Court Court Decisions Court Rules Legal 63