Constitutional Law Court Decisions Government Legal 
Constitutional Law Reporter
AUGUST 6, 2024
Constitution. Like many local governments, Grants Pass has public-camping laws that restrict encampments on public property. 514 (1968), in which the Court rejected a similar request to extend Robinson. Texas , 392 U.S.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JUNE 25, 2024
In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court emphasized that while a government official can share her views freely and criticize particular beliefs in the hopes of persuading others, she may not use the power of her office to punish or suppress disfavored expression. Those allegations, if true, state a First Amendment claim.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 10, 2023
Supreme Court has concluded its oral arguments for the 2022-2023 Term. The Court’s final week included four cases, with issues ranging from bankruptcy to RICO to government takings. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. 2d 1112, 1115 (7th Cir.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 29, 2024
In reaching its decision, the Court explained that a State law that merely restricts land use in a way “reasonably necessary to the effectuation of a substantial government purpose” is not a taking unless it saps too much of the property’s value or frustrates the owner’s investment-backed expectations.
Constitutional Law Reporter
APRIL 4, 2023
Supreme Court held that the penalty for the nonwillful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) is $10,000 per report rather than per account. The statute imposes a maximum $10,000 penalty for nonwillful violations of the law. Instead, the relevant legal duty is the duty to file reports.”
SCOTUSBlog
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
Share Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting Constitutional Law: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights , edited by Professors M.C. In a watershed decision in Gideon v. Mirow and Howard Wasserman.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JULY 9, 2024
Supreme Court held that where parties have agreed to two contracts — one sending arbitrability disputes to arbitration, and the other either explicitly or implicitly sending arbitrability disputes to the courts — a court must decide which contract governs. Basic legal principles establish the answer.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
.png)
52 
Let's personalize your content