Constitutional Law Court Decisions Law School Legal 
Constitutional Law Reporter
JUNE 3, 2022
Jackson, 51, also adds to the relative “youth” of the current Court, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh also in their 50s. Jackson Brings Diversity to the Supreme Court. Like many of her peers on the Supreme Court, Jackson attended a prestigious law school, graduating from Harvard Law School in 1996.
JonathanTurley
JULY 8, 2024
Below is my column in The Hill on the over-wrought reaction to the Supreme Court decision in Trump v. Commentators seemed to compete for the most alarmist accounts from court-sanctioned death squads to political assassinations to the death of democracy. United States. Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
JULY 12, 2022
She has called for “genuine” law professors not to fall “into complicity with lawlessness” in teaching such subjects. It is the latest voice of intolerance and orthodoxy at a leading law school. In the age of rage, calls for radical action from both professors and students have been particularly amplified at Georgetown University.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 13, 2022
He is also a graduate of Columbia Law School. In Harlan’s case, the story arc that first attracted me was the notion of posthumous vindication – how a man who went so far out on a limb in his time could land so comfortably in the mainstream of legal thought. I corresponded with Canellos about his book. The back story.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 4, 2021
It was later preserved by a divided Supreme Court despite the view of a majority that it was unconstitutional. President Biden acknowledged that his legal experts overwhelmingly told him that any extension would violate the Constitution. Like many, I was mystified by the Supreme Court decision not to strike down the moratorium.
JonathanTurley
APRIL 19, 2021
After the riot, various legal experts appeared on news channels to proclaim that this was a strong if not conclusive case for criminal incitement. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig declared “As a prosecutor I’d gladly show a jury Trump’s own inflammatory statements and argue they cross the line to criminality.”
JonathanTurley
JUNE 30, 2024
Below is my column on the Supreme Court decision on Friday in Fischer v. to reject hundreds of charges in January 6th cases for the obstruction of legal proceedings. The claim is legally absurd but politically advantageous. For many cases, that will leave relatively minor offenses like trespass or unlawful entry.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
.png)
52 
Let's personalize your content