This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google. The Fourth Circuit had previously upheld a trial courtdecision that South Carolina waived its Eleventh Amendment protections against subpoenas by participating in the federal lawsuit.
Supreme Court upheld the Protecting Americans from Foreign Controlled Applications, which will require TikTok to shut down in the United States unless its Chinese parent company divests its interest. The Courtsdecision in TikTok Inc. Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging the constitutionality of the Act. TikTok Inc.s
In May, the Hamburg Max Planck Institute organized an online panel to discuss implications from the German Federal ConstitutionalCourtDecision on the Act to Combat Child Marriages rendered just prior.
Wisconsin Supreme CourtsDecision CCB and the sub-entities sought judicial review. The post Supreme Court to Consider Tax Exemptions for Religious Organizations appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.
Share Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting ConstitutionalLaw: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights , edited by Professors M.C. Cortada’s painting reminds us that Gideon’s petition started a constitutional debate that is still ongoing.
Lower CourtsDecision The district court dismissed the case under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which generally bars suits against firearms companies based on criminals misusing their products. A decision is expected before the end of the term in June/July 2025. In appealing to the U.S.
Wade has been settled law during her entire career. In this article Biehl succinctly and expertly identifies how the upcoming Supreme Courtdecision in Dobbs V. Kathy Biehl is a lawyer licensed in two states, as well as a prolific multidisciplinary author and writer.
In a 5-2 decision, the Kenya Court of Appeal on Friday upheld a Kenya High Courtdecision declaring the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), a constitutional amendment bill, unconstitutional. The court expressed that the said doctrine limits the amendment power set out in Articles 255-257 of the Constitution.
The justices recently granted certiorari in two cases challenging state laws that restrict social media companies’ ability to moderate content on their platforms. The key issue before the Court is whether the Texas and Florida laws violate the First Amendment. Facts of the Cases The two cases before the Court, Moody v.
Supreme Court upheld a federal law that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun. Since the founding, our Nation’s firearm laws have included provisions preventing individuals who threaten physical harm to others from misusing firearms.” In United States v.
At sentencing, he sought to take advantage of the “safety valve” provision of federal sentencing law, which allows a sentencing court to disregard the statutory minimum if a defendant meets five criteria. Among those is the criminal history requirement, set out in Paragraph (f)(1). The paragraph creates an eligibility checklist.
Supreme Court rejected a constitutional challenge to a California animal welfare law that requires pork sold in the state to come from humanely raised pigs. According to the Court, the law did not violate the dormant commerce clause in regulating the pork industry outside California.
The Supreme Court went on to find that Smagin was injured in the United States “because his ability to enforce a California judgment, confirming an international arbitration award, was impaired by racketeering activity that largely occurred in or was direct from and targeted at California.”
Supreme Court held that Section 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 — which limits the amount of post-election contributions that may be used to repay a candidate who lends money to his own campaign — violates the First Amendment because it “burdens core political speech without proper justification.” Supreme CourtDecision.
Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their borders to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. ,
In response to the courtsdecision, the Louisiana Legislature adopted a new redistricting map via by Senate Bill 8 (SB8), which established a second majority-Black congressional district to resolve the Robinson litigation. A decision is expected by the end of the term in June/July. Please check back for updates.
In the past 20 years, the court has announced substantive constitutionallaw, pleading requirements, and timeliness rules that make it harder to win such arguments. But that alternative need not be an execution method authorized under a state’s current law. The pertinent habeas provision ( 28 U.S.C.
It contains the following contributions: ESSAYS Mareike Schmidt, Kulturalität der Rechtsanwendung und internationale Rechtsvereinheitlichung – Überlegungen am Beispiel des UN-Kaufrechts, 643–671, DOI: [link] Cultural Dimensions in the Application of Law and International Unification of Law – The Example of the CISG. –
In Simmons , the Supreme Court held that where a defendant’s future dangerousness is at issue, and state law prohibits his release on parole, due process requires that the sentencing jury be informed that the defendant is parole ineligible. The Arizona Supreme Court had previously interpreted Rule 32.1(g)
We have been discussing the state laws requiring contractors and employees to swear that they do not support the the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (“BDS”) movement against Israel. I have long maintained that the law is unconstitutional as a limitation of free speech and associational rights. 50-5-85(b). ” O.C.G.A.
On appeal, the Supreme Court of Georgia determined that the jury’s “guilty but mentally ill” verdict for felony murder was “repugnant” to the jury’s “not guilty by reason of insanity” verdict for malice murder under Georgia law, because the verdicts “required affirmative findings of different mental states that could not exist at the same time.”
MoneyGram applied the common-law escheatment practices outlined in Texas v. Multiple States, including Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, argue that the common law does not apply because the abandoned proceeds of the Disputed Instruments are governed by the Disposition of Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler’s Checks Act. New Jersey , 379 U.S.
The first clause focuses on “remedies” and sets forth this general rule: “Nothing [in IDEA] shall be construed to restrict” the ability to seek “remedies” under “other Federal laws protecting the rights of children with disabilities.” The Court ultimately concluded that Perez’s interpretation better comported with the statute’s terms. “The
By a vote of 6-3, the Court held that Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether a federal agency has acted within its statutory authority, and courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.
Facts of the Case The case centers on the Constitution’s Appropriation Clause, which commands that “[n]o Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law. As the Supreme Court explained in Cincinnati Soap Co. United States , 301 U.S. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote on behalf of the majority.
The term refers guns that are assembled in parts and, therefore, difficult to trace by law enforcement due to their lack serial numbers and transfer records. The post SCOTUS Kicks Off New Term With … appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. The most closely watched case is Garland v. Williams v. Maryland and Napue v.
Supreme Court upheld a city ordinance that imposes criminal penalties on homeless sleeping outside. According to the Court, the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property does not constitute “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Supreme Court upheld a federal law that criminalizes “encouraging or inducing” an immigrant to come or remain in the United States unlawfully. According to the Court, the law does not run afoul of the First Amendment. In United States v. Hansen , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S.
Pursuant to the FAA, arbitration agreements are “valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.” After petitioners sued Flowers and two of its subsidiaries for violating state and federal wage laws, Flowers moved to compel arbitration.
In such actions where the Commission elects to institute administrative proceedings to address statutory violations, it typically delegates the initial adjudication to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) with authority to resolve motions, hold a hearing, and then issue a decision. Saul , 593 U.S.
The District Court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim, and the Eighth Circuit affirmed. It held that “[w]here state law recognizes no property interest in surplus proceeds from a tax-foreclosure sale conducted after adequate notice to the owner, there is no unconstitutional taking.”
As separate sovereigns pre-existing the Constitution, Indian tribes have the same common-law immunity from suit traditionally enjoyed by sovereign governments—unless and until Congress unequivocally expresses its intent to abrogate that immunity. Please check back for updates.
The statute imposes a maximum $10,000 penalty for nonwillful violations of the law. As explained by the Supreme Court, FBAR reports are designed to help the government trace funds that may be used for illicit purposes and identify unreported income that may be subject to taxation.
Section 1028A(a)(1) applies when a defendant, “during and in relation to any [predicate offense, such as healthcare fraud], knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person.” The Court today rightly rejects that unserious position.”
Supreme Court held that when an expert conveys an absent lab analyst’s statements in support of the expert’s opinion, and the statements provide that support only if true, then the statements come into evidence for their truth, and implicate the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. The Court’sdecision was unanimous.
Notably, the Court’s narrow decision did not directly address the merit of the Rogers test or when it may be appropriate to apply. The post SCOTUS Sides With Jack Daniels in Dog Toy Trademark Dispute appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
The suit before the Supreme Court alleges that Alabama’s electoral maps are racially gerrymandered in violation of the United States Constitution and/or dilute the votes of Black Alabamians in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
While not binding, lower courts may be influenced by his reasoning. The post SCOTUS Issues Term’s First Decision – Finds ADA Case Moot appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter. According to Justice Thomas, Laufer’s “claim d[id] not assert a violation of a right under the ADA, much less a violation of her rights.”
Following Colorado law, the trial court rejected that argument under an objective standard, finding that a reasonable person would consider the messages threatening. It offers ‘enough ‘breathing space’ for protected speech,’ without sacrificing too many of the benefits of enforcing laws against true threats,” Justice Kagan wrote. “As
Supreme Court held that 18 U.S.C. Facts of the Case As the Court explained in its opinion, Federal and state law distinguish between two kinds of payments to public officials—bribes and gratuities. In Snyder v. United States , 603 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. As enacted in 1984, the statute at issue in the case, 18 U.S.C.
In support of its decision, the Court cited the FCA’s statutory text and common-law principles, emphasizing that the FCA’s text and common-law roots demonstrate that the FCA’s scienter element refers to a defendant’s knowledge and subjective beliefs.
The Supreme Court next addressed the Government’s argument that several prior Courtdecisions establish that the provision is jurisdictional. According to the majority, none of the three decisions definitively interpreted §2409a(g) as jurisdictional.
According to the dissenters, the majority’s decision has the potential to be “profoundly destabilizing.” “ Any established government regulation about any issue — say, workplace safety, toxic waste, or consumer protection — can now be attacked by any new regulated entity within six years of the entity’s formation,” Justice Jackson wrote.
District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that the sweepstakes violated various California laws. The District Court determined that the Official Rules’ forum selection clause controlled the parties’ dispute and accordingly denied the motion.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content