Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court Decisions Remove Laws
article thumbnail

Fundamental Rights and PIL after the German Federal Constitutional Court Decision on the Act to Combat Child Marriages

Conflict of Laws

In May, the Hamburg Max Planck Institute organized an online panel to discuss implications from the German Federal Constitutional Court Decision on the Act to Combat Child Marriages rendered just prior.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld a federal law that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun. Since the founding, our Nation’s firearm laws have included provisions preventing individuals who threaten physical harm to others from misusing firearms.” In United States v.

Laws 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of State Social Media Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter

The justices recently granted certiorari in two cases challenging state laws that restrict social media companies’ ability to moderate content on their platforms. The key issue before the Court is whether the Texas and Florida laws violate the First Amendment. Facts of the Cases The two cases before the Court, Moody v.

Laws 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter

At sentencing, he sought to take advantage of the “safety valve” provision of federal sentencing law, which allows a sentencing court to disregard the statutory minimum if a defendant meets five criteria. Among those is the criminal history requirement, set out in Paragraph (f)(1). The paragraph creates an eligibility checklist.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court declines South Carolina agency appeal in Google antitrust case

JURIST

In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google. The Fourth Circuit had previously upheld a trial court decision that South Carolina waived its Eleventh Amendment protections against subpoenas by participating in the federal lawsuit.

Court 129
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Decides Key Elections Law Case

Constitutional Law Reporter

The Supreme Court went on to find that Smagin was injured in the United States “because his ability to enforce a California judgment, confirming an international arbitration award, was impaired by racketeering activity that largely occurred in or was direct from and targeted at California.”

Court 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Upholds Corporate Personal Jurisdiction Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their borders to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. ,

Court 52