Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court Decisions Remove Laws Remove Ohio
article thumbnail

Ohio Bill Follows Texas With Harsher Abortion Penalties

LegalReader

Ohio lawmakers have introduced new anti-abortion bill.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Upholds Corporate Personal Jurisdiction Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their borders to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. ,

Court 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness

SCOTUSBlog

Both reshaped American law and society. But only one can be chosen by SCOTUSblog readers as the greatest justice in the court’s history. Ask any constitutional law student to name the most iconic Supreme Court decision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. Ohio and Miranda v. Board of Education.

Court 106
article thumbnail

Georgetown Professor Under Fire For Reading The “N-Word” In A Class On Free Speech and Racism

JonathanTurley

Ohio (a 1969 case that we can discussed much in terms of “violent speech”), the Court struck down an Ohio law prohibiting public speech that was deemed as promoting illegal conduct. Ironically, the was a class discussion on free speech and racism. Swers was quoting Clarence Brandenburg from Brandenburg v.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Takes Jack Daniels Trademark Case with Major Free Speech Implications

JonathanTurley

Image from Supreme Court Petition. City of Pharm in which an Ohio man was prosecuted for posting a parody of his local police department. Now the Court has accepted a different parody case involving Jack Daniels where the company is suing the maker of dog chew toys. The case is Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc.

Court 34
article thumbnail

Greater than Holmes? The life and legacy of John Marshall Harlan

SCOTUSBlog

He is also a graduate of Columbia Law School. In the end, though, a large part of the story turned on the question of just what it was that enabled Harlan to see the law so differently from his peers. Harlan also joined a unanimous court in 1889 in rejecting a challenge to the Chinese Exclusion Act. The back story.

Court 123
article thumbnail

Trump’s Surprise Witness: Rep. Waters Becomes A Possible Witness Against Her Own Lawsuit

JonathanTurley

Moreover, they would fail under a lower standard of proof than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in criminal law. Richard Ashby Wilson, associate law school dean at the University of Connecticut, said “Trump crossed the Rubicon and incited a mob to attack the U.S. Trump’s Jan. If we don’t, we cannot go away.”.