Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court Decisions Remove Litigating
article thumbnail

Supreme Court declines South Carolina agency appeal in Google antitrust case

JURIST

In that case, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google. The Fourth Circuit had previously upheld a trial court decision that South Carolina waived its Eleventh Amendment protections against subpoenas by participating in the federal lawsuit.

Court 129
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Adds Gerrymandering Case to Docket

Constitutional Law Reporter

Facts of the Case The cases spring from more than two years of litigation, in which two separate groups of voters have challenged Louisianas congressional maps. In the first round of redistricting litigation, Robinson, et al v. A decision is expected by the end of the term in June/July. Please check back for updates.

Court 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of State Social Media Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter

Both laws also require platforms to provide individualized explanations for certain forms of content moderation and mandate that platforms provider general disclosures about their content-moderation practices. In the Florida case, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction in part.

Laws 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines

Constitutional Law Reporter

A claim-processing rule is a mandatory deadline that regulates the timing of motions or claims before the court; however, unlike jurisdictional deadlines, is subject to waiver and forfeiture by the litigant. b)(2)(B) governs the conduct of the district court, not the litigants. Additionally, Rule 32.2(b)(2)(B)

Court 52
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Clarifies Reach of FAA Exemption for Transportation Workers

Constitutional Law Reporter

All this “complexity and uncertainty” would “‘breed[] litigation from a statute that seeks to avoid it.’” The Court next turned to Flowers argument that the §1 exemption would sweep too broadly without an implied transportation-industry requirement.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Upholds Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in Alabama Redistricting Case

Constitutional Law Reporter

In 1992, Section 2 litigation challenging the State of Alabama’s then-existing districting map resulted in the State’s first majority-black district and, subsequently, the State’s first black Representative since 1877. Alabama’s congressional map has remained remarkably similar since that litigation.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Rules Quiet Title Act’s Time Bar Is Claim-Processing Rule

Constitutional Law Reporter

In reaching its decision, the Court noted the important distinction between “the classes of cases a court may entertain (subject-matter jurisdiction)” and “nonjurisdictional claim-processing rules, which seek to promote the orderly progress of litigation by requiring that the parties take certain procedural steps at certain specified times.”

Statute 52