This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
However, the court found the 2021 reform conflicted with Article 103 of the Basic Law. The majority stated the purpose of the law is to “ensure legal certainty” and guarantee German citizens protection from criminal double jeopardy.
He claimed the interpretation of articles 1 and 19 of the Treaty on European Union are inconsistent with the Constitution. Filipek, a specialist at the Faculty of ConstitutionalLaw, represented the opposite side and defended the constitutionality of the EU law.
The Indian Supreme Courtruled on Wednesday that women can sit for the NDA (National Defence Academy) admission exam in a landmark interim order which will allow more women to serve in India’s armed forces.
“Circuit Scoop: January 2025; January 2025 brought pivotal federal appeals courtrulings that challenge agency power, shape business regulations, and influence constitutionallaw, with long-lasting effects on future legal battles.”
The Supreme Court raised concerns about the workability of the Ninth Circuit’s standards, which would require tribal officers first to determine whether a suspect is non-Indian and, if so, to temporarily detain a non-Indian only for “apparent” legal violations.
” He warned of the negative human rights implications, stating: The combined effects of this bill, attempting to shield Government action from standard legal scrutiny, directly undercut basic human rights principles. This comes after the UK Supreme Courtruled in November 2023 that the Rwanda policy was unlawful.
The decision represents the first 5-to-4 split in a case argued during the Court’s 2020-21 term. Legal Background. Second, the features of a reopening decision make it one “ by which rights or obligations have been determined, or from which legal consequences will flow.” The post Divided CourtRules U.S.
For those who want to know if their rights have been violated, the least dangerous branch will become the least expensive source of legal advice.” A contrary rule would have meant, in many cases, that there was no remedy at all for those rights, such as due process or voting rights, that were not readily reducible to monetary valuation.
In a 5-4 decision, the court dismissed the suit and upheld the current policy that only medical professionals can give tattoos. Upholding this decision, the court characterized tattooing as an invasive procedure that raises important safety concerns. But younger generations are challenging this connotation.
In January, I wrote a column criticizing the legal position of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in favor of Whole Food workers seeking to wear Black Lives Matter (BLM) symbols or clothing at work. In my view, that position is legally unsustainable but continues to be advanced by the General Counsel and the NRLB.
The primary issue in both cases is whether the Court should reverse its decision in Grutter v. 2241 whenever it “appears that the remedy by [§ 2255] motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [their] detention.” Decisions in all of the cases are expected before the Court’s term ends in June.
In overturning the death sentence, the Supreme Courtruled that the Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to choose the objective of his defense and to insist that his counsel refrain from admitting guilt. After McCoy , Tyler unsuccessfully sought relief in Louisiana state courts. In Tyler v. Ballance v.
Supreme Courtruled that public officials may be held liable for their social media activity in certain circumstances. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. The Sixth Circuit Courtruled that Freed was not liable because he maintained his Facebook page in his personal capacity. In Lindke v.
In the final decision of the Supreme Court before its summer break, Chief Justice John Roberts delivered a major ruling striking down the California law requiring the disclosure of donors for charities. An array of groups opposed the state law from the ACLU to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
Supreme Courtruled that the National Rifle Association (NRA) may continue its First Amendment lawsuit against the former head of New York’s Department of Financial Services. The Supreme Court also reaffirmed its holding in Bantam Books, Inc. In National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo , 602 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S.
The Tenth Circuit upheld the district court decision in favor of the IRS and its authority to conduct the audit. Thomas noted that in 2005 a fractured divided courtruled Gonzales v. There is also massive public support for legalization that has been building for years. Raich , 545 U.S.
In 2009, the New York courtsruled that Metro workers were not legally required to assist a woman being raped at a station. In torts, there is no duty to rescue rule. That was the holding in the famous ruling in Yania v. Bigan , 397 Pa. 316, 155 A.2d Cf: Restatement, Torts, § 322. .
The District Courtruled that all class members had Article III standing on each of the three statutory claims. Congress may enact legal prohibitions and obligations. And Congress may create causes of action for plaintiffs to sue defendants who violate those legal prohibitions or obligations.
I have a legal education.” It is called the “rule of lenity” and has been around in the English system for centuries. For example, in 1547, the court was faced with a law making it a felony of steal “Horses, Geldings or Mares.”
Ending standardized testing will have a notable impact on legal challenges to the use of race in college admissions. The Supreme Court has issued a series of 5-4 decisions that have ruled both for and against such race criteria admissions — but even justices supporting such systems have expressed reservations.
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. City of Chicago , the courtruled that this right applied against the states. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f) It’s no secret that many federal courts have engaged in systematic resistance to Heller and McDonald.”.
As a teenage congressional page, I was one of the faces in that crowd gathered around the court in October 1977 to watch history being made. In Bakke, the courtruled against affirmative action in a fractured decision. Whatever value a test-blind system may have academically, it could be impactful legally.
He writes in the areas of Jurisprudence and Legal Theory, Intellectual Property, Contracts, Bankruptcy, Law and Economics, Business and Corporate Law at USD. It shows the same combination of student cancelling campaigns and the enabling actions of school administrators.
What is most striking however is the coverage in the Washington Post, which reported on the summary affirmance but only quoted supporters for the challenge, including a strikingly misleading take on the lower courtruling upheld by the Supreme Court. I have written about D.C. even though it is not constitutionally required to.”
Moreover, Muñoz’s claim to a procedural due process right in someone else’s legal proceeding would have unsettling collateral consequences. The post Supreme CourtRules Spousal Immigration Is Not a Right appeared first on ConstitutionalLaw Reporter.
Last year, the court restricted the ability of state prisoners to develop new evidence to support claims that their attorneys failed to investigate leads that could have shown they were factually innocent. Jones involves a federal prisoner who is legally innocent – the conduct a jury found he committed isn’t a crime.
On February 8, 2022, the Chamber of Deputies of the Italian Republic gave its final approval to the proposed constitutionallaw A.C.3156-B 3156-B providing environmental protection amendments to Articles 9 and 41 of the Italian Constitution. By Riccardo Luporini, Matteo Fermeglia, and Maria Antonia Tigre. In Neubauer, et al.
District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle has ruled that the federal law prohibiting people from possessing firearms inside post offices is unconstitutional. The ruling is based on 2022 Supreme Courtruling New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. The case concerned Emmanuel Ayala, U.S. .”
There is no real prospect that the court would reach any different conclusion after a trial. The result is a blow to the media to be able to report on newsworthy material that it acquired from sources, even if legal or protected in the United States. Yet, it operates under a hazy set of laws that often treats journalism as a privilege.
” In 2014, the Courtruled 6-2 in Schuette v. Bamn , that Michigan’s constitutional amendment banning affirmative action was constitutional. Indeed, it does not even warrant a consideration of countervailing constitutional and legal authorities.
Missouri , the Courtruled that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rule should be allowed to take effect nationwide as the lower courts consider legal challenges. The rule thus fits neatly within the language of the statute.”. However, held in Biden v.
” It turns out she might have been more accurate than she thought — because Fauci legally may have been just a “regular guy” giving out billions without authority. What is equally baffling is that the House informed the administration that it was presumptively in violation of federal law. Rand Paul (R-Ky.),
In Re: The Petition To Summon A Grand Jury the courtruled in favor of Steven Davis in forcing the empanelment of a grand jury to investigate Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and others for allegedly engaging in various election crimes.
We recently discussed a federal courtruling that the Texas law requiring age verification and warning for porn sites was unconstitutional. Now, Judge Timothy Brooks in Arkansas has found that another state law imposing age verification requirements for social media violates the First Amendment. In Netchoice, LLC v.
I previously wrote about the latest New York gun law passed after the Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen and how it follows a long line of legally flawed legislative measures in the area. It did not take long. On Thursday, federal District Judge Glenn T.
“Expansion of the jury trial right would constitute a meaningful structural reform in democratizing criminal justice, at a time when such change is needed to establish the popular legitimacy of the criminal justice system,” writes J.D. King in a paper published in the University of Pennsylvania Journal of ConstitutionalLaw.
Sullivan’s lawsuit was one of a number of civil actions brought under state laws that targeted Northern media covering the violence against freedom marchers. The Supreme Courtruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press.
The bills are the latest examples of “gotcha legislation,” though the Florida bill could raise some interesting legal questions if Gov. Both proposals face serious legal challenges and likely could not survive as codified soundbites. Newsom’s gun ‘heartbeat’ law. Here is the column: California Gov.
Civil and statutory claims can be curtailed by constitutional limitations. Supreme Courtruled against a provision of federal law that banned computer simulations and virtual pornography under the first amendment. This is such a case in my view. In 2002, the U.S. In Ashcroft v. In New York Times v.
469 (1989), the Supreme Court struck down a set-aside for minority businesses due to a lack of evidence of specific injuries. However, even liberal scholars like Erwin Chemerinsky seem to concede that these reparation measures would face series legal headwinds in the courts. In City of Richmond v.
But the Convention came together to declare that equal rights, including rights for women and LGBTQ+ people, should be a fundamental value of American constitutionallaw. It was in response to the Supreme Court decision Kelo v. The fourth and final amendment to pass was an amendment limiting eminent domain. New London.
Court refuses to recognize parents’ rights A recent legal decision captured this growing divide. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit ruled last month that parents had no protected right to be informed when their children change their gender identity in public school.
A panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seemed to be channeling the lyrics of the musical Hamilton in noting that “Everything is legal in New Jersey.”
This also generates questions of whether such a field of law is needed at all or which particular issues it should govern, as the possible area of regulation is to a large extent covered by other areas of law, namely international law, conflict of laws, constitutionallaw, and administrative law as well as by the field of diplomacy.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content