Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court Rules Remove Legal
article thumbnail

German court rules double jeopardy statute unconstitutional

JURIST

However, the court found the 2021 reform conflicted with Article 103 of the Basic Law. The majority stated the purpose of the law is to “ensure legal certainty” and guarantee German citizens protection from criminal double jeopardy.

Statute 211
article thumbnail

Top Poland court rules EU measures on judicial reforms unconstitutional

JURIST

He claimed the interpretation of articles 1 and 19 of the Treaty on European Union are inconsistent with the Constitution. Filipek, a specialist at the Faculty of Constitutional Law, represented the opposite side and defended the constitutionality of the EU law.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

India top court rules women can take defense academy admission exam

JURIST

The Indian Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that women can sit for the NDA (National Defence Academy) admission exam in a landmark interim order which will allow more women to serve in India’s armed forces.

article thumbnail

“Circuit Scoop: January 2025; January 2025 brought pivotal federal appeals court rulings that challenge agency power, shape business regulations, and influence constitutional law, with long-lasting effects on future legal battles.”

HowAppealing

“Circuit Scoop: January 2025; January 2025 brought pivotal federal appeals court rulings that challenge agency power, shape business regulations, and influence constitutional law, with long-lasting effects on future legal battles.”

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules Tribal Police Can Detain and Search Non-Native Americans

Constitutional Law Reporter

The Supreme Court raised concerns about the workability of the Ninth Circuit’s standards, which would require tribal officers first to determine whether a suspect is non-Indian and, if so, to temporarily detain a non-Indian only for “apparent” legal violations.

article thumbnail

UN expresses concern over moves by UK government to facilitate Rwanda removal plan for migrants

JURIST

” He warned of the negative human rights implications, stating: The combined effects of this bill, attempting to shield Government action from standard legal scrutiny, directly undercut basic human rights principles. This comes after the UK Supreme Court ruled in November 2023 that the Rwanda policy was unlawful.

article thumbnail

Divided Court Rules U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Decision Subject to Judicial Review

Constitutional Law Reporter

The decision represents the first 5-to-4 split in a case argued during the Court’s 2020-21 term. Legal Background. Second, the features of a reopening decision make it one “ by which rights or obligations have been determined, or from which legal consequences will flow.” The post Divided Court Rules U.S.