This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
While it has received little coverage in the mainstream media, the conservative group Project Veritas won a major victory against the NewYork Times this week in a defamation case with potentially wide reach. Notably, this follows another significant loss by the NewYork Times to Sarah Palin last year. seven times.
As predicted , the Supreme Court handed down a momentous opinion in favor of Second Amendment rights today in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. City of Chicago , the courtruled that this right applied against the states. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f) ” NewYork Gov.
There is an interesting ruling this week out of NewYork where a federal court has ruled in favor of a conservative student group alleging that the State University of NewYork at Binghamton has engaged in a pattern of censorship of conservative speakers and events. I disagree. See also id.,
Below is my column in the Hill on the makings of a blockbuster case in NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. Bruen, the first major gun rights case before the Supreme Court in ten years. The court will soon take up NewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f)
I have previously written about how NewYork has proven time and time again as the gift that keeps on giving for the National Rifle Association (NRA) and gun-rights groups. NewYork Democrats continue to pass laws that are virtually guaranteed to be struck down and further reinforce Second Amendment rights.
President and Fellows of Harvard College , the litigants cite a study finding that Asian Americans needed SAT scores that were about 140 points higher than white students; the gap with admitted African American and Hispanic students is even greater. NewYork topped the per capita spending, at $24,040 per kid.
NewYork has long been the source of major litigation over gun control. That includes the possible loss before the Supreme Court in a pending major gun rights case. ” The NewYorklaw could offer an important test of the outer boundaries of this right after the Courtrules in the pending case.
District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle has ruled that the federal law prohibiting people from possessing firearms inside post offices is unconstitutional. The ruling is based on 2022 Supreme CourtrulingNewYork State Rifle & Pistol Association v. The case concerned Emmanuel Ayala, U.S.
There is a move in many states to refuse to allow such exemptions, but courts have pushed back. In NewYork, the state is appealing a preliminary injunction against its refusal to allow religious exemptions to its vaccine mandate. They also can refile if the lower court has not reached a decision by Oct.
In the past, politicians in cities like NewYork, Chicago and Washington, D.C., They have pushed ill-considered legislation and litigation that only served to create precedent against gun control. Moreover, the earlier ban was imposed in 1994 — before the Supreme Courtruled in District of Columbia v.
Cities, too, are enforcing misgendering rules; for example, the NewYork City Human Rights Law allows for fines if employers, landlords or professionals fail to use a preferred name, pronoun or title. Yet some people have religious beliefs against following the new order and using such pronouns.
In the past, politicians in cities like NewYork, Chicago and Washington, D.C., They have pushed ill-considered legislation and litigation that only served to create precedent against gun control. Moreover, the earlier ban was imposed in 1994 — before the Supreme Courtruled in District of Columbia v.
In court papers, she was identified only as “L.C.”. Four years later, her case reached the Supreme Court. In a 6-3 opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the courtruled in Olmstead v. Glucksberg , a case in which he helped persuade the court to unanimously uphold Washington’s ban on physician-assisted suicide.
I was therefore gladdened by the Supreme Courtruling 8-1 in favor of the free speech in the case, even if it meant a victory for odious Westboro Church. The Court in cases like NewYork Times v. In NewYork Times v. However, the standard is quite high. In Neiman-Marcus v. Confidential.”
After Dobbs was accepted, advocates sought to enjoin a Texas law that banned abortion after just six weeks. The courtruled 5-4 to allow the Texas law to be enforced. The Biden administration and other litigants then forced a reconsideration of that decision. Gun rights.
The standard for defamation for public figures and officials in the United States is the product of a decision over 50 years ago in NewYork Times v. The NewYork Times had run an advertisement referring to abuses of civil rights marchers and the arrest of Martin Luther King Jr. When NewYork Times v.
A new lawsuit by the Chinese American Civil Rights Coalition has garnered national attention in the media where former President Donald Trump is being sued for his use of such terms as the “Chinese Virus,” “China Virus,” “Wuhan Flu,” and “ Kung Flu.” Major loser, zero credibility!”
While most Administrations tend to minimize such test cases to avoid creating bad precedent, the Biden Administration has litigated with an utter abandon — elevating political over legal considerations in litigation. In the prior decision, the Courtruled 5-4 decision in Alabama Association of Realtors v.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Court Said Climate Scientist Provided Sufficient Evidence of Actual Malice for Blog Authors but Not for Publisher.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content