JonathanTurley

MAY 12, 2021

.” However, the appellate panel corrected noted that such laws are narrowly construed in light of controlling precedent. This includes Virginia state court rulings that the statute must be confined to speech that has “a direct tendency to cause acts of violence by the person to whom, individually, [the language is] addressed.”

Statute 39

Statute Misdemeanor Court Rules Court 39

JonathanTurley

MAY 31, 2021

While the lower courts ruled for Harvard, the trial judge did note that there may have been bias in favor of minority admissions and encouraged Harvard to deal with such “implicit bias” while monitoring “any significant race-related statistical disparities in the rating process.” Indeed, it may only exacerbate them.

Education 49

Education Litigation Litigating Court 49

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 24, 2023

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that racial discrimination does not become good policy despite being carried out with the best of motivations. the high court ruled that “legislative assurances of good intention cannot suffice.” Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School.

Education 63

Education Law School Court Court Rules 63

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 27, 2021

The courts, including the state supreme court , ruled for Cross, noting that he could keep his job, adhere to his faith and satisfy the policy by avoiding pronouns altogether. Recently, a California court ruled that misgendering patients is protected despite a landmark LGBTQ+ rights bill.

Court Rules 39

Court Rules Misdemeanor Court Education 39

JonathanTurley

JULY 11, 2023

In one case involving challenged administrative law judges in 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v. Executive officials do not have the authority to dismiss federal law any more than they have the authority to act without meeting the conditions to hold their positions under federal law.

Legal 32

Legal Legal Court Rules Government 32

JonathanTurley

JULY 27, 2021

The Court could then have addressed the question in another case but elected to Arlene’s Flowers v. Washington in light of its decision. State of Washington and Arlene’s Flowers v. Then the Supreme court denied certiorari in July 2021. On June 15, 2021, a Colorado District Court ruled in Scardina v.

Court 46

Court Laws Manufacturing Statute 46

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

Lauren Handy and nine other anti-abortion activists were charged last year with conspiring to obstruct access to a Washington abortion clinic on Oct. They have asked for the dismissal of the indictment for lack of jurisdiction since the Court ruled in Dobbs that “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.”

Court 44

Court Laws Statute Contract 44

The Crime Report

AUGUST 11, 2022

justice system and reduce mass incarceration, argues a Washington and Lee University law professor. Expansion of the jury trial right would constitute a meaningful structural reform in democratizing criminal justice, at a time when such change is needed to establish the popular legitimacy of the criminal justice system,” writes J.D.

Misdemeanor 124

Misdemeanor Drafting Constitutional Law Court 124

JonathanTurley

MARCH 13, 2021

Courts have upheld the right of citizens to insult police, which is an unfortunate aspect of policing. Thus, in 2015, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that police could not arrest a 17-year-old who called them “pigs.”

Court Rules 36

Court Rules Court Laws Constitutional Law 36

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 17, 2021

Hunt , in which the Court struck down an Alabama law imposing a fee on all interstate waste coming into the state under the Dormant Commerce Clause. The Court ruled that “no state may attempt to isolate itself from a problem common to the several States by raising barriers to the free flow of interstate trade.”

Immigration 33

Immigration Laws Court Sports 33

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 26, 2022

Those words from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals about Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act may be some of the most honest but chilling words ever uttered in a federal opinion. The court ruled that a state could not only compel an artist to speak but could prevent that artist from speaking, too.

Court 44

Court Court Rules Laws Constitutional Law 44

JonathanTurley

APRIL 27, 2021

Last September, Stanford University and University of Washington researchers wrote that a Project Veritas video alleging voter fraud with unidentified sources was what a “a domestic, coordinated elite disinformation campaign looks like in the United States.” Project Veritas has been accused of misleading edits or accounts.

Tort 54

Tort Lawyer Lawyers Depositions 54

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

469 (1989), the Supreme Court struck down a set-aside for minority businesses due to a lack of evidence of specific injuries. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. In City of Richmond v. For Newsom and for San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors, the bill is now due.

Immigration 44

Immigration Legal Legal Government 44

JonathanTurley

JULY 24, 2024

Jonathan Turley is a Fox News Media contributor and the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University. If figures like Jankowicz want to continue to make money silencing others, we can at least call them for what we believe they are: censors.

Court Rules 53

Court Rules Court Government Legal 53

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 8, 2022

Now, the Delaware Supreme Court has rejected a Democratic universal mail-in voting law as unconstitutional. The Delaware Supreme Court ruled on Friday that a state law enacting universal mail-in voting violated the state’s constitution.

Court 44

Court Construction Statute Laws 44

JonathanTurley

APRIL 18, 2023

In the past, politicians in cities like New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C., Moreover, the earlier ban was imposed in 1994 — before the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. have proven to be the gun lobby’s greatest asset. Heller that the right to bear arms is an individual right.

Court Rules 45

Court Rules Litigation Litigating Court 45

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 3, 2021

This term however has more drama and tension as Democrats call for packing the Court with an instant liberal majority and others attack its members in anticipation of opinions that have yet to be written. The reality is summed up in one of my favorite stories about Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes when he was on trip to Washington.

Court 38

Court Court Rules Laws Education 38

JonathanTurley

JUNE 24, 2024

However, the court denied him the right to have a jury rule on the key issue of whether these prior offenses occurred on different occasions. The court ruled that a jury had to decide this issue unanimously under a standard of beyond reasonable doubt. Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C.

Legal 55

Legal Legal Laws Court 55

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

After long debating whether it even has this authority, OSHA has suddenly found it, and then has issued one of the most comprehensive health-based standards in its history — all without rule-making or debate. Ironically, the Supreme Court warned against such sudden agency “finds” of regulatory authority.

Court 38

Court Statute Small Business Lawyer 38

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 13, 2022

San Francisco Regional Director Jill Coffman declared that the company is violating the rights of workers in 10 different states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Maryland, Georgia, Washington, Indiana, and California). In her consolidated complaint against Whole Foods Market, Inc.,

Lawyer 8

Lawyer Lawyers Government Court Rules 8

JonathanTurley

MARCH 11, 2022

In 1981, a federal district court ruled in Idaho v. The Supreme Court later stayed that order but then declared the matter moot.). Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. Yet, they still fell short. You “ start over.”.

Laws 43

Laws Court Legal Legal 43

JonathanTurley

JULY 2, 2024

It is not clear what these paper-bag pundits are more upset about: the fact that the Court ruled in favor of immunity or that the Court again failed to yield to years of harassment and threats from the left. What they fail to understand is that this is precisely the moment that the Court was designed for. and Maurice C.

Court 81

Court Constitutional Law Laws Government 81

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 30, 2024

” The Court ruled that “it is a highly appropriate function of a public school education to prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive terms in public discourse.” ” While the Court had found that “F**k the Draft” was protected for adults in Cohen v.

Court 49

Court Drafting Education Attorney 49

JonathanTurley

JUNE 1, 2021

As we await important and likely divided decisions on issues like abortion, Chief Justice John Roberts and his colleagues seem to be sending a message that the Court is not so rigidly ideological as Democratic members and activists suggest. Palomar-Santiago , an immigration decision that ruled for the government and against an immigrant.

Court 60

Court Immigration Court Rules Government 60

JonathanTurley

MAY 24, 2021

In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that a minority set-aside program in Virginia was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. The government cited historical barriers for minority enterprises, but the court balked. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.

Court 59

Court Government Small Business Court Rules 59

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2022

In court papers, she was identified only as “L.C.”. Four years later, her case reached the Supreme Court. In a 6-3 opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court ruled in Olmstead v. Dellinger lost both of those cases, but he notched plenty of victories, including in Washington v.

Court 90

Court Lawyer Lawyers Law School 90

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

The Washington Post confirmed that the United States is one of only seven out of the world’s 198 countries that allow for abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy.). This term the court was presented with two pre-viability challenges. The court ruled 5-4 to allow the Texas law to be enforced.

Stare Decisis 37

Stare Decisis Court Laws Law School 37

JonathanTurley

JULY 8, 2024

As it has in the past, the court adopted a three-tiered approach to presidential powers based on the source of a presidential action. Sawyer , in which the court ruled against President Harry Truman’s takeover of steel mills. Chief Justice John Roberts cited Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. Jonathan Turley is the J.B.

Court 51

Court Law School Laws Court Decisions 51

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 8, 2022

The same concerns were raised this week after Washington Gov. Such a law would threaten political speech and create a chilling effect for those who want to raise such concerns in contested elections. Indeed, this seems like an effort to evade the constitutional limits placed on incitement crimes by the courts.

Misdemeanor 51

Misdemeanor Criminal Law Laws Court 51

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 3, 2022

After Dobbs was accepted, advocates sought to enjoin a Texas law that banned abortion after just six weeks. The court ruled 5-4 to allow the Texas law to be enforced. The court — as expected — allowed the appeal to go forward for some of the litigants in the lower court but again refused to enjoin the law.

Court 43

Court Litigation Litigating Laws 43

JonathanTurley

JULY 4, 2022

After major rulings on gun rights, abortion and climate change, Democratic leaders and pundits declared the court to be “illegitimate.” Madison in 1803, when the court ruled that it must be the final arbiter of what the law means. For example, after the court ruled in Worcester v.

Court Rules 41

Court Rules Court Laws Court Decisions 41

JonathanTurley

JUNE 9, 2022

Nothing could be more damaging to the litigation and the federal courts quickly rejected the CDC and Tribe arguments. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the order was unconstitutional. In Washington, D.C., These losses began to pile up soon after the President took office.

Court 44

Court Litigation Litigating Court Rules 44

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 9, 2020

In an interview with the Washington Examiner, diGenova quickly stated that his comment was a joke and not intended as a threat. I was therefore gladdened by the Supreme Court ruling 8-1 in favor of the free speech in the case, even if it meant a victory for odious Westboro Church.

Tort 34

Tort Lawyer Lawyers Real Estate 34

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 5, 2021

1), for example, would negate state laws on voter identification and vote-curing rules and “ballot harvesting,” bar the purging of voter lists, dictate registration and removal conditions, and impose other federal rules in a massive 800-page takeover of elections. It seeks to negate the Supreme Court ruling in Shelby County v.

Laws 54

Laws Court Government Education 54

JonathanTurley

JULY 15, 2022

.” Ironically, it was the only part of the president’s remarks that is consistent with what the court actually said in its decision in Dobbs v. Wade, the court ruled that millions of citizens, not nine justices, must now decide the question of abortion. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In overturning Roe v.

Court 35

Court Laws Court Rules Legal 35

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 5, 2024

The court has virtually invited Congress to pass laws giving people greater standing to sue the government. Yet this crisis is the result of decades of court rulings expanding executive powers while limiting the ability to challenge those policies.

Immigration 58

Immigration Court Government Laws 58

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. State of Washington ex rel. Spokane County District Court , No. HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 148. FEATURED CASE. Haskell v.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40