Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court Remove Court Decisions Remove Government
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Clarifies Court Must Resolve Competing Arbitration Provisions

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court held that where parties have agreed to two contracts — one sending arbitrability disputes to arbitration, and the other either explicitly or implicitly sending arbitrability disputes to the courts — a court must decide which contract governs. Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court held that a district court’s failure to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(2)(B)’s The Government also later provided McIntosh with a pretrial bill of particulars that included as property subject to forfeiture $75,000 in cash and a BMW that McIntosh purchased just five days after one of the robberies.

Court 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds CFPB Funding Scheme

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld the funding scheme that supports the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau). Facts of the Case The case centers on the Constitution’s Appropriation Clause, which commands that “[n]o Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law. of America, Ltd.,

Court 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules Federal Agencies Can Be Sued Under Fair Credit Reporting Act

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court held that a consumer may sue a federal agency under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681n and 1681o for failing to comply with the terms of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). While the District Court sided with the USDA, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. government. Kirtz , 601 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Clarifies When Public Officials Can Be held Liable for Social Media Activity

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court ruled that public officials may be held liable for their social media activity in certain circumstances. The District Court found that because Freed managed his Facebook page in his private capacity, and because only state action can give rise to liability under §1983, Lindke’s claim failed. In Lindke v.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Holds FBAR Penalties Are Calculated Per Report

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court held that the penalty for the nonwillful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) is $10,000 per report rather than per account. The statute imposes a maximum $10,000 penalty for nonwillful violations of the law. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the government’s assessment.

Court 59
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Sides With NRA in First Amendment Dispute

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court ruled that the National Rifle Association (NRA) may continue its First Amendment lawsuit against the former head of New York’s Department of Financial Services. The Supreme Court also reaffirmed its holding in Bantam Books, Inc. The Supreme Court also reaffirmed its holding in Bantam Books, Inc. Sullivan , 372 U.S.