This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Ask any constitutionallaw student to name the most iconic Supreme Courtdecision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. Those two landmark rulings stand as the most celebrated decisions the court has ever issued. Maryland : “[W]e must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.”
Supreme Court returns to the bench on October 7, 2024. The term refers guns that are assembled in parts and, therefore, difficult to trace by law enforcement due to their lack serial numbers and transfer records. . Below is a brief summary of the other cases before the Court: Royal Canin U.S.A., 1983 in state court.”
The United States Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (and the later denial of a motion for consideration ) in rejecting the much touted lawsuit to give residents a vote in Congress. I have written about D.C. residents a vote.
Less than two years after the abusive treatment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett , the Senate is holding a hearing that is dramatically different in the treatment of the Supreme Court nominee and the issues considered relevant to her confirmation.
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. While the issues before the Court are largely procedural at this point, the Court’sdecision will still be consequential, particularly with regard to lower courts’ issuance of nationwide injunctions. On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Washington , Trump v. Sandford , 19 How.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Supreme Court reversed an intermediate appellate court’sdecision affirming a superior court determination that the defendant could not present a necessity defense.
Supreme Court has agreed to consider legal challenges to President Donald Trumps executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship. Facts of the Case The Supreme Court will hear three cases, which have been consolidated for Supreme Court review: Trump v. Washington , and Trump v. New Jersey. citizen nor a permanent resident.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content