Remove Constitutional Law Remove Court Remove Court Decisions Remove Ohio
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Sides With Employee in Reverse Discrimination Case

Constitutional Law Reporter

Ohio Department of Youth Services , 605 U.S. _ (2025), the U.S. In this case, Petitioner Marlean Ames, a heterosexual woman, has worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services in various roles since 2004. The District Court granted summary judgment to the agency, and the Sixth Circuit affirmed. Green , 411 U.S.

article thumbnail

What Have We Learned about Justice Barrett?

The Volokh Conspiracy

A key portion of the article summarizes a preliminary analysis of Justice Barrett's voting record over her first three-and-a-half terms on the Court. As longtime readers know, I believe Court watchers place too much weight on individual terms, none of which (in isolation) is ever representative of the Court's overall work.

Court 98
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Upholds Corporate Personal Jurisdiction Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring corporations operating within their borders to consent to personal jurisdiction when they register to do business in those states. According to the Court, such laws do not offend the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. In Mallory v.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Takes Jack Daniels Trademark Case with Major Free Speech Implications

JonathanTurley

Image from Supreme Court Petition. City of Pharm in which an Ohio man was prosecuted for posting a parody of his local police department. Now the Court has accepted a different parody case involving Jack Daniels where the company is suing the maker of dog chew toys. The case is Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc. 2d 341 (9th Cir.

Court 56
article thumbnail

Georgetown Professor Under Fire For Reading The “N-Word” In A Class On Free Speech and Racism

JonathanTurley

Ohio (a 1969 case that we can discussed much in terms of “violent speech”), the Court struck down an Ohio law prohibiting public speech that was deemed as promoting illegal conduct. Ironically, the was a class discussion on free speech and racism. Swers was quoting Clarence Brandenburg from Brandenburg v.

article thumbnail

The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness

SCOTUSBlog

Ask any constitutional law student to name the most iconic Supreme Court decision, and they’ll probably answer Marbury v. Those two landmark rulings stand as the most celebrated decisions the court has ever issued. Maryland : “[W]e must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.”

Court 107
article thumbnail

Supreme Court To Hear Major Employment Discrimination Case Today

JonathanTurley

Supreme Court will hear a case with potentially sweeping implications for discrimination cases. Ohio Department of Youth Service involves an Ohio woman, Marlean Ames, who claims she was discriminated against for being straight as less-qualified LGBT colleagues in Ohio’s youth corrections system were promoted.

Court 63