This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on a major parental rights case in Mahmoud v. They lost in the lower courts, including the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Florida allows for school choice and has demanded greater performance from public schools. The parents cited Wisconsin v.
Supreme Court next term. The justices recently granted certiorari in two cases challenging state laws that restrict social media companies’ ability to moderate content on their platforms. The key issue before the Court is whether the Texas and Floridalaws violate the First Amendment. The court held that S.B.
The bill would only affect entities with market caps exceeding $150 billion, which for practical purposes demonstrates that it is unambiguously intended to punish the Walt Disney Company for Disney’s recent stance against the “Don’t Say Gay” bill in Florida.
The post Mary Jane’s Presence In Court Will Make Quite A Splash appeared first on Above the Law. The object-oriented ontologists have infiltrated the courtroom!
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in three cases last week. California , which involves whether police pursuits for misdemeanors justify a warrantless entry, an issue which has divided the lower courts. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two other cases. Below is a brief summary: Florida v.
Supreme Court recently agreed to consider two cases involving the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. United States, will decide whether a defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause were violated when his codefendant’s redacted out-of-court confession was admitted during his trial. The first, Smith v.
Supreme Court tackled some of the most closely watched cases of the term. In challenging the law, TikTok and its users argue that the PAFACAA violates the First Amendment and constitutes an unlawful bill of attainder under Article I. The Court also considered five other cases. Upon returning from break, the U.S.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday refused to block orders by courts in North Carolina and Pennsylvania that threw out the congressional maps enacted by the states’ Republican legislatures and replaced them with maps drawn by the trial courts. 23, the state supreme court refused to put the expert’s map on hold.
Supreme Court unanimously held that the Constitution permits the retrial of a defendant following a trial in an improper venue conducted before a jury drawn from the wrong district. Facts of the Case Timothy Smith was indicted in the Northern District of Florida for theft of trade secrets from a website owned by StrikeLines.
Supreme Court unanimously held that the Constitution permits the retrial of a defendant following a trial in an improper venue conducted before a jury drawn from the wrong district. Facts of the Case Timothy Smith was indicted in the Northern District of Florida for theft of trade secrets from a website owned by StrikeLines.
The Florida case has been referred to that state’s highest court for an advisory ruling on the state of the state’s law on the issue, and earlier this week, the same thing happened in California. A decision on this issue in any state is binding only in that state.
Supreme Court held oral arguments in six cases to end its February sitting. A pair of cases challenging Texas and Florida’s controversial social media laws took center stage. In the Florida case, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that S.B. NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton and Moody v. McIntosh v. Coinbase, Inc.
It is a curious call for a governor to make after he ran ads in Florida calling on people to “join us in California.” California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) chimed in, declaring the flight from Florida might be “ State-sanctioned kidnapping.” First, let’s look at the law. Gavin Newsom (D.,
Supreme Court confirmed that social-media platforms have First Amendment interests in exercising editorial discretion over the third-party content. Facts of the Case In 2021, Florida and Texas enacted statutes regulating large social-media companies and other internet platforms. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Citing Zauderer v.
Supreme Court continues to add high-profile gun rights cases to its docket. The second case centers on whether a “bump stock” – an attachment that converts a semiautomatic rifle into a fully automatic weapon – qualifies as a “machinegun” under federal law. Supreme Court granted certiorari on November 3, 2023. It continues today.”
Florida Gov. To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States…” Denaturalization is largely based on the granting of citizenship based on fraudulent or false representations. Ron DeSantis s(R) yesterday called for the denaturalization of Rep.
The calls to boycott Ben & Jerry’s ice cream in states like Texas, Florida ,and Oklahoma will give citizens the common choice between something Half Baked and the American Dream. ” An actual state boycott could raise serious constitutional questions in interfering with interstate commerce and free speech.
Share Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting ConstitutionalLaw: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights , edited by Professors M.C. It was both an “act of desperation” and an “act of faith in the United States constitution.”
Three University of Florida political science professors have told a federal court that the university barred them from assisting plaintiffs in a challenge to the state’s new voting laws. As state employees, they were told that litigating against a state law would be “adverse to U.F.’s I disagree.
Florida Gov. Nevertheless, Rodrigues declared “it is a felony under Floridalaw to ‘knowingly provide material support … to a designated foreign terrorist organization.’” The Supreme Court has repeatedly struck down such content-based bans and has been particularly protective of free speech in higher education.
.” The filing is a Jackson Pollock of legal claims with twelve claims thrown against Florida from false imprisonment to intentional infliction of emotional distress to misuse of the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund. The filing of a lawsuit upon entry to the United States is not unprecedented, of course. which was completely false.”
There is a major victory for free speech out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit this week. An appellate panel ruled that the discriminatory-harassment and bias response team policies at the University of Central Florida (UCF) likely violate the First Amendment.
In Florida, U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle has ruled that the federal law prohibiting people from possessing firearms inside post offices is unconstitutional. The ruling is based on 2022 Supreme Court ruling New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v.
’ appeared first on Above the Law. It's not 'speech,' it's 'sanitary nuisance!' The post Judge Rebukes DeSantis Admin: ‘It’s The First Amendment, Stupid.’
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in six cases last week, with two potential First Amendment blockbusters before the Court. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the free speech claims , determining that Vullo is entitled to qualified immunity. Supreme Court granted certiorari on November 3, 2023.
We previously discussed about the effort to fire University of Central Florida Professor Charles Negy after he tweeted about “black privilege.” UCF President Alexander Cartwright abandoned any pretense of academic freedom or principle in falling to protect a colleague from an anti-free speech campaign.
Below is my column in USA Today on the “deactivation order” issued to a controversial pro-Palestinian group at the University of Florida. The issuance of a deactivation order last month in Florida sounded like it involved a routine decision by the utility to cut off service because of an overdue bill. Here is the column.
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld critical provisions in Florida election law reforms, including provisions that Democratic politicians and pundits spent years misrepresenting as “a return to Jim Crow.” Courts have swatted back these challenges and refused injunctions.
ONE: On Above the Law’s Thinking Like A Lawyer , host Joe Patrice interviews former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal about his memories arguing before the justice and clerking for her when she was new to the Supreme Court. Craig Williams interviews constitutionallaw Prof. TWO: On Lawyer 2 Lawyer , host J.
Charles Barzun is a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia, where he teaches ConstitutionalLaw, Evidence, Jurisprudence, and Torts.He is currently working on a book on the American common law tradition. Consider a few examples: In his 1997 opinion for the court in Old Chief v.
Sample Florida License A move by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles could present a long-awaited test case on transgender identity. The Department is reportedly moving to bar people from listing their transgender identity for their gender on Florida driver’s licenses.
On December 30, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit handed down a major opinion in in Adams v. Johns County, Florida. The court ruled 7-4 against a statutory and constitutional challenge of a transgender student to a district policy requiring students to use bathrooms corresponding to their biological sex.
The US Supreme Court on Monday vacated and remanded lower court rulings regarding the constitutionality of statutes enacted by Florida and Texas to regulate large social media companies’ content moderation practices. Key to the court’s ruling in Moody v. Neither court performed that necessary inquiry.
Supreme Court, an array of marquee cases tends to draw all of the attention. In the case before the court, New York’s Department of Financial Services is accused of using increased regulatory scrutiny and possible penalties to coerce financial institutions into ending their support for certain black-listed groups.
Below is my column in The Messenger on the passing of one of the greatest figures in human rights law, my former colleague Tom Buergenthal. Tom will be laid to rest this afternoon in Florida. The recusal was a riveting moment for the court, and his colleagues quickly dispensed with the frivolous claim.
The last week’s historic decisions from the Supreme Court led to an array of factual objections from critics. It examines mortality rates in Florida newborns between 1992 and 2015 and shows a 0.13% to 0.2% Before joining the court, Justice Louis Brandeis filed such a brief in his brilliant challenge to work place conditions.
” Two similar lawsuits are pending in Florida and Indiana on the grounds that it violates the religious freedom for Jewish people. The law is not a model of legislative drafting. However, a court could easily adopt a logical interpretation that the destruction of a fertilized egg outside of the womb is not an abortion.
Share At the end of each year, SCOTUSblog remembers some of the people whose lives and work left an imprint on the Supreme Court. From legendary lawyers to lesser-known activists, journalists, and plaintiffs, the following individuals who died in 2022 all shaped the court and the law in their own ways. David Beckwith (Oct.
Below is my column in The Hill on the recent bills proposed in Florida and California on immigration and guns. The bills are the latest examples of “gotcha legislation,” though the Florida bill could raise some interesting legal questions if Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Florida Gov. Newsom’s gun ‘heartbeat’ law.
Courts tend to defer to measures ostensibly protecting others from risk of illness; even in criminal cases, the government has been allowed to conduct “ pretextual traffic stops ” if it can cite an objective basis. .” States also are moving to counter private mandates or to bar mandatory masking rules; Florida Gov.
Those ominous words captured the hand-wringing, hair-pulling reaction to the dismissal of the Florida case against Donald Trump by Judge Aileen Cannon. It was not just that she reached a conclusion long supported by some conservative lawyers and a Supreme Court justice. Many point to a challenge in 2019 in the D.C. Attorneys General.
Florida Southern District Court. He argues that the court is allowed to take “judicial notice” of the agreement in light of the fact that it has been used previously in court, including the voluntary dismissal of her battery claims against Epstein’s former attorney, Alan Dershowitz in a parallel case.
The school districts are relying on a bill, Senate Bill 1303, that was approved and signed into law last year. However, the bill does not mandate masks per se and this issue will quickly move to the courts for a face off on masks. Youngkin, however, may be stymied by a single line inserted by Democrats into a state law last year.
Below is my column in The Messenger on the challenge facing the Supreme Court in the coming week over the electoral disqualification of former president Donald Trump in Colorado and Maine. The appeal in Maine has been filed and can now work its way up to the Court. Colorado is expected to file with the Court this week.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content