This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
News Rankings, which lawschool got top marks for its constitutionallaw program? Hint: More than 200 graduates of this lawschool currently serve as judges on federal, state, and administrative courts, and more than 300 graduates have clerked or will clerk on the U.S. Supreme Court.
“How Professors Can Teach ConstitutionalLaw While the Supreme Court Is Wrecking It; The lawschool version of constitutionallaw taught students that lawyers and judges are at the vanguard of protecting people who lack political power; As the Court’s most recent term has demonstrated, they are not”: G.S.
“Canadian Supreme Court Justice Rosalie Abella appointed Pisar Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard LawSchool; Justice Abella is world-renowned for her decisions and theories on equality, human rights, and constitutionallaw”: Rachel Reed of Harvard Law Today has this report.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas won’t be teaching a constitutionallaw seminar at the George Washington University LawSchool after thousands of students asked…
The majority of the Supreme Court is once again shifting their interpretation of the law in order to support right-wing political objectives! More lawschools are kicking USNWR rankings to the curb. We're now at 10 percent of lawschools that say they will not participate in the ranking process.
It was a bathroom break that inspired Bradley Neal , a 3L at The George Washington University LawSchool , to develop a product that uses generative AI to help law students better understand and brief cases. Returning to class after a visit to the bathroom, he had lost the thread of the case the professor was discussing.
Berkeley Law’s California Constitution Center on Friday held a major all-day conference focusing on the California Supreme Court. Six of the court’s justices and a federal Court of Appeals judge participated on various panels. A conversation between the court’s newest justice , Patricia Guerrero, and Carrillo.
Leah Spero — Director of the California Appellate Advocacy Program at the newly renamed UC Law San Francisco — has told us about moot courts available through the Program to help practitioners prepare for their California Supreme Court arguments in civil cases.
The Spring/Summer 2021 Review of the California Supreme Court Historical Society has reached mailboxes and is available online. [I’m Here are the contents: What Did We Learn from the California Courts’ Response to the Influenza Epidemic of 1918-1919? I’m on the Society’s board.]. by Jennifer King.
in Alberta, for example, a paralegal is not allowed to represent another person in court, but they can in Ontario or British Columbia. Law Clerk – This term is commonly used in Ontario and denotes someone who does a mix of administrative and substantive tasks, but is usually less substantive than that of a paralegal.
Lincoln Caplan is a senior research scholar and a visiting lecturer in law at Yale LawSchool and also teaches in Yale’s English and political science departments. By 5-4, in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. Seattle School District No. They are his most powerful.
Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Saul Cornell is the Paul and Diane Guenther chair in American history at Fordham University and adjunct professor of law at Fordham LawSchool. Bruen does mark a new low for the court.
Below is my column on the growing attacks on the legitimacy of the Supreme Court after the decision to overturn Roe v. As the Court ends its term, Democratic leaders are calling for removing justices, packing the Court, and other extreme reactions to the decision in Dobbs v. issued a warning to the Supreme Court: Reaffirm Roe v.
Written by Hadrien Pauchard (assistant researcher at Sciences Po LawSchool) The fourth issue of the Revue critique de droit International privé of 2023 (available here ) was released online some time ago. It features two articles and several case notes. The full table of contents is available here.
Here are the facts from the opinion: On April 1, 2022, the lawschool at the University of Idaho held a “moment of community” in response to an anti-LGBTQ+ slur that had been left anonymously on a whiteboard in one of its classrooms in Boise, Idaho. Plaintiff Seamon is a professor at the lawschool and the CLS faculty advisor.
We recently discussed the controversy at Rutgers LawSchool over the reading of the “n-word” from a state supreme court opinion. The requirement (for any group receiving more than $250) presents some interesting questions in the conflict between free speech and diversity programs at such schools.
Any first-year law student knows that you cannot comment on the silence of a Mirandized defendant after an arrest under the Fifth Amendment – let alone ignore a court order. The judge correctly tore into the prosecutor. Biased media viewers. Even without the unforced errors by the prosecution, this was always a difficult case.
Georgetown University LawSchool Professor Rosa Brooks has drawn accolades and criticism for her appearance on MSNBC’s “The ReidOut” after declaring that Americans are “slaves” to the U.S. Constitution and that the Constitution itself is now the problem for the country.
Lawschools are also facing controversial mandates. In 2022, the American Bar Association required lawschools to “provide education to law students on bias, cross-cultural competency, and racism: (1) at the start of the program of legal education, and (2) at least once again before graduation.” and Maurice C.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has delivered a body blow to free speech as well as academic freedom in a ruling against a statistics professor at North Carolina State University. Professor Stephen Porter objected to what he considered the lower standards used by his school to hire minority faculty.
I am happy to announce the publication of my latest law review article, The Unfinished Masterpiece: Compulsion and the Evolving Jurisprudence Over Free Speec h. The work not only discusses the recent 303 Creative ruling of the Supreme Court, but an important case now pending before the Court for possible review, Porter v.
This false narrative is being repeated despite the fact courts have rejected this claim in actual criminal cases. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University LawSchool.
The charges are connected to the prior controversy and raise serious free speech and retaliatory concerns at the lawschool. . Sharma was targeted at UNC LawSchool because he would not agree that a recent exchange between law students involved a racial insult. So the question is whether it is disparaging.
As Eugene Volokh correctly pointed out , the California Labor Code protects “political activities” employees and the California Supreme Court ruled in Gay Law Students Ass’n v. If necessary, he can sue and prevail in court. Instead, Schapiro criticized Smith and ordered an investigation. Here is our reaction.
Shapiro Professor Of Public Interest Law. The George Washington University LawSchool. Former U.S. Northern District of Ohio. Cleveland, OH. Professor Jonathan Turley. Washington, D.C. Turley.Senate Judiciary Committee.Testimony.Domestic Terrorism.2022.
Many migrants are released soon after capture, including some without a hearing date or court dates that are years in the future. Moreover, it is not clear how transporting migrants who entered the country illegally to another state is a violation of law. The reason is that these claims are made for cable news, not courts of law.
I recently discussed the Supreme Court’s affirmance of a decision rejecting constitutional arguments that the District of Columbia is entitled to a vote in Congress. I have repeatedly testified and written on the constitutional barriers to such a vote absent statehood. I was delighted when he accepted.
Share The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on various ideas for Supreme Court reform. President Joe Biden appointed the 36-member commission to write a report on various court-reform options. Other potential timeframes include 12 or 16 years.
There is a curious resolution of a civil right complaint against University of Minnesota LawSchool over a diversity fellowship sponsored by the law firm of Jones Day. Despite being created by a law firm and administered by a lawschool, the fellowship violated federal law in excluding white and male applicants.
Supreme Court. Jackson will replace Justice Stephen Breyer who is set to retire when the Court’s term ends this summer. While Jackson’s confirmation will not shift the balance of the Court, it will make the Court more diverse and more reflective of the country. Jackson is also the Court’s sixth female justice.
I have the pleasure of speaking this morning at the University of Maryland LawSchool as part of the Law Review’s annual symposium on constitutionallaw. I will be on the first panel at 10:15 at the lawschool. I have long argued that these conflicts should be viewed as free speech cases.
Courts have repeatedly found the Biden administration to be engaging in racial discrimination in such programs. Another court held that the administration engaged in systemic discrimination in implementing COVID-19 relief for restaurants and bars. the high court ruled that “legislative assurances of good intention cannot suffice.”
I began my association with the House as a teenaged leadership page in the 1970s and continued through to my legal representation of the House in federal court. I have testified more than 100 times over the last four decades on a wide array of constitutional and statutory issues.
During his time as an associate justice from 1877 to 1911, he broke with his colleagues in some of the most consequential – and infamous – rulings that the court has ever issued. He is also a graduate of Columbia LawSchool. Harlan also joined a unanimous court in 1889 in rejecting a challenge to the Chinese Exclusion Act.
Guha Krishnamurthi is an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law. His research interests are in criminal law, criminal procedure, constitutionallaw, and jurisprudence. Prior to being a professor, Krishnamurthi clerked for the California Supreme Court.
It was always doubtful that a lawschool would take the unprecedented step of barring a sitting Supreme Court justice. The problem is that most targets of these campaigns have neither the status nor the day job of a Supreme Court justice. The reason? His vote to overturn Roe v.
The problem is that the courts already recognize some religious exemption arguments. Those arguments are based on both the constitutional protection of religious values but also laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. There is a move in many states to refuse to allow such exemptions, but courts have pushed back.
That appears to be the case of Emory law professor, Darren Hutchinson , who has claimed that the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was “basically a Klansman.” Hutchinson recounted on Twitter how he taught a difficult lesson at Emory LawSchool on how “Justice Scalia was basically a Klansman.”
Brandon Hasbrouck is an assistant professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law, has written an article in The Nation calling for a new form of reparations based on voting. He previously argued for packing the Court with “race-conscious justices.” In 1964, the Supreme Court handed down Reynolds v.
In 2005, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned accounting firm Arthur Andersen’s conviction for its destruction of documents under a standard record-management system. Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University LawSchool. Musk has forced citizens to take sides on the free-speech fight.
This switchboarding process was confirmed by Brian Scully of the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), during prior court testimony. Ohio , 378 U.S. 184 (1964): “I shall not today attempt further to define [it] … But I know it when I see it.”
This movement is expanding and accelerating in its effort to curtail the right that Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once called “indispensable” to our constitutional system. He repeatedly had to go to court to defend his right to continue to teach. Ready to sign your rights away? Wait, there is more.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content