Constitutional Law Court Law School Virginia 
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 12, 2021
I recently discussed the Supreme Court’s affirmance of a decision rejecting constitutional arguments that the District of Columbia is entitled to a vote in Congress. I have repeatedly testified and written on the constitutional barriers to such a vote absent statehood. I was delighted when he accepted.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 9, 2021
Share President Joe Biden will issue an executive order to create a commission to study potential reforms to the Supreme Court, the White House announced on Friday. In its statement, the White House indicated that the commission will be a bipartisan one, made up of experts “on the Court and the Court reform debate.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 30, 2024
Below is my column on the Supreme Court decision on Friday in Fischer v. The court rejected this theory and noted that that the “novel interpretation would criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyists alike to decades in prison.” Smith has been here before. Bob McDonnell.
The Crime Report
NOVEMBER 19, 2021
When Berkeley Law School Dean and constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky taught Criminal Procedure in the Fall of 2019, he became frustrated when he realized many of the cases that were the subject of his lectures ended with the police winning and the rights of suspects losing. And I think the answer is no.
JonathanTurley
JANUARY 3, 2024
Below is my column in The Messenger on the challenge facing the Supreme Court in the coming week over the electoral disqualification of former president Donald Trump in Colorado and Maine. The appeal in Maine has been filed and can now work its way up to the Court. Colorado is expected to file with the Court this week.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 20, 2023
While the odds tend to favor the lower court in such orders, there is ample reason to object to the scope and language of the order. Her order bars Trump from making statements against Smith, his staff, court personnel, and potential witnesses. It is not surprising that Smith dismisses such concerns.
JonathanTurley
SEPTEMBER 17, 2023
The motion states that Trump’s “recent extrajudicial statements are intended to undermine public confidence in an institution — the judicial system — and to undermine confidence in and intimidate individuals — the Court, the jury pool, witnesses, and prosecutors.” These courts have elected to daisy-chain trials before the election.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
.png)
31 
Let's personalize your content