Constitutional Law Court New York Statute 
Constitutional Law Reporter
DECEMBER 6, 2023
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in three cases this week, with the Second Amendment taking center stage. In the wake of the country’s most recent mass shooting, the justices considered a case that could overturn a federal gun law. The case, United States v. Bruen , 597 U.S. _ (2022). 1681 et seq.,
Constitutional Law Reporter
DECEMBER 4, 2023
Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in its first significant Second Amendment case in two years. Rahimi, will decide whether a federal law banning the possession of guns by individuals who are subject to domestic violence restraining orders is constitutional. The case, United States v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 27, 2022
Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Saul Cornell is the Paul and Diane Guenther chair in American history at Fordham University and adjunct professor of law at Fordham Law School. Bruen does mark a new low for the court.
Constitutional Law Reporter
AUGUST 13, 2024
Supreme Court upheld a federal law that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun. 922(g)(8) , a federal statute that prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order from possessing a firearm. In United States v. Rahimi , 602 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S.
JonathanTurley
JULY 12, 2021
Below is my column in the Hill newspaper on the declaration of a gun violence emergency by New York Gov. The centerpiece of Cuomo’s plan is a new law to allow victims of gun violence to sue gun manufacturers under a nuisance theory. It has failed repeatedly in various states, including New York.
Constitutional Law Reporter
OCTOBER 18, 2021
Supreme Court will return to the bench on October 4, 2021, and conduct oral arguments in person for the first time since March 2020. New York: A litigant’s argumentation or introduction of evidence at trial is often deemed to “open the door” to the admission of responsive evidence that would otherwise be barred by the rules of evidence.
JonathanTurley
SEPTEMBER 22, 2024
The Kohls complaint argues that the law flips the burden to creators to establish a defense. One of the more interesting legal issues is how the law defines “malice.” ” The legislators lifted the definition from New York Times v. In 1967, the Supreme Court handed down Time, Inc. Curtis Publ’g Co.,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content