This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from the SouthCarolina Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism (SCDPR) challenging a lower court ruling that found the state had waived sovereign immunity by participating in a federal antitrust lawsuit against Google.
SouthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP , 602 U.S. _ (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the lower court erred in finding that a SouthCarolina congressional district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. In Alexander v.
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in three cases last week. The issues before the Court included choice-of-law clauses, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s whistleblower protection, and racial gerrymandering. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co.,
Supreme Court sided with John Montenegro Cruz, a death row inmate in Arizona. According to a 5-4 majority, Arizona erred in refusing to apply the Court’s precedent set forth in Simmons v. SouthCarolina , 512 U.S. After Cruz’s conviction became final, the Supreme Court held in Lynch v. Arizona , 578 U.S.
It describes the role of Black women in the Civil War, ‘the most famous being Harriet Tubman, who scouted for the 2nd SouthCarolina Volunteers.’”. The only sentence in which she appears notably lacks the reverence found in the document about Jefferson. Yes, the Founders and Framers were overwhelmingly white.
A SouthCarolina state judge Friday temporarily blocked a newly-signed abortion ban that went into effect Thursday after being signed by SouthCarolina Governor Henry McMaster. I hope that the Supreme Court will take this matter up without delay.”
The SouthCarolina legislature is moving to enact a new law with deeply troubling free speech implications. Otherwise, it would likely be struck down by the courts. The language below is reminiscent of laws making it illegal to share information on committing suicide. Abortion is a protected right in many states.
A federal court found a non-racial purpose in the law to require a majority-supported election as a “bedrock ingredient of democratic political philosophy.” That part of the opinion was upheld by the appellate court , though the court was reversed on other grounds.
He previously argued for packing the Court with “race-conscious justices.” ” I have been a critic of court packing schemes raised after the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Hasbrouck argues “[t]he Constitution’s framers set up the Electoral College to protect the interests of slave states.”
However, the moment that most struck me was an exchange between Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and Maine Chief Deputy Attorney General Christopher Taub where Taub appeared to acknowledge that legislatures have every right to ban critical race theory (CRT) from being taught.
That leaves many in the public uninformed of issues that could ultimately undo parts of these bills in the courts. When the Constitution was written, the Framers expressly warned of the need to keep the federal government at bay in elections. Absent a federal takeover of elections, laws like the one in Georgia are likely to be upheld.
Black churches feeling like they are going to get shot up, like at a Bible study that’s happened in SouthCarolina. With 382 saleswomen and models, the court found that the group was too large. However, with the 25 salesmen, the court found that an action could be maintained. The Court in cases like New York Times v.
The election was marred by open fraud, including SouthCarolina certifying a vote of 101% of the eligible voters. As a compromise, the commission was formed and consisted of 15 members : five Supreme Court justices and five members from each chamber of Congress. That is why the current challenge is unwarranted.
Here is the column: It is a touchstone of American constitutionallaw that nothing protects your right to shout “fire!” Moreover, it also distracts us from critical constitutional issues. It is also important to note that the electoral votes of a given state can be challenged in the courts, as they were after the 2020 election.
Below is my column in The Messenger on the challenge facing the Supreme Court in the coming week over the electoral disqualification of former president Donald Trump in Colorado and Maine. The appeal in Maine has been filed and can now work its way up to the Court. Colorado is expected to file with the Court this week.
Below is my column the the Hill on the early controversies over President Joe Biden’s first nomination for the Supreme Court. Hawaii) has made controversial comments over her desire to have the next nominee rely not just on the law but the nominee’s life experiences to reach the right result in court cases.
The problem was that rampant fraud was alleged in Florida, Louisiana and SouthCarolina. For example, SouthCarolina reported 101 percent of voters voting). Gore in 2000, the Supreme Court ordered an effective halt to further litigation, but that was just one state. In Bush v. 8 or beyond Dec.
Below is my column in the Hill on the expected fight over the Supreme Court seat to be vacated by Justice Stephen Breyer. The Democrats are calling for a confirmation process strikingly different from their own approach in the last three Supreme Court nominations. Yet one favorite is SouthCarolina District Court Judge J.
Below is my column in the Wall Street Journal on President Joe Biden’s promise almost two years ago that he would only consider a black female for the first vacancy on the Supreme Court. The three leading candidates are Justice Leondra Krueger of the California Supreme Court, U.S. That is not true.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content